Foundation-specific: Malicious leadership creating unsustainable working environment - Philanthropy Officer Swedish Employee Review

1.0
Nov 17, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly coworkers and okay benefits. Three weeks of PTO.

Cons

This review pertains specifically to the Swedish Foundation, which operates closely with but separate from Swedish. Recent changes in leadership have exacerbated an existing problem with cliquish middle management. What was once a place of creativity and collaboration has, since these changes, very quickly become an environment where fear is the top motivator, and no one feels free to speak up and express concerns for fear of retaliation. In response to the most recent employee engagement survey indicating that compensation was an area for improvement, middle management treated this concern with scorn, sometimes outright laughter. Some employees rely on housing assistance, while multiple middle and upper managers drive luxury cars, carry designer handbags, and live in multi-million dollar homes. The callousness and out-of-touch-ness in their response to employee concerns was disappointing. Additionally, when some female employees were promoted, their new salaries were still less than male employees at the same level. Employees of color have been hired at lower levels (in terms of title and pay) than white employees, despite having comparable experience. Flexible work arrangements made before recent leadership changes will not be honored, and discussion and negotiation are not on the table. Employees have been let go rather than even simply discuss compromise. Workers have been put on performance improvement plans (whose terms ended in termination) despite having average and above average KPIs, including dollars raised. When asked for justification and explanation, only vague and unverifiable claims were made. Upper management told employees that they would be in Tuesday-Thursday and had employees sign a contract stating that they would be in office three days per week as well. However, a week or two after this contract, upper management visited the office and found that most employees were working from home on that Friday (having come in to the office Tuesday-Thursday). The leadership team then changed the expectation to Tuesday-Thursday and every other Friday in office, because they thought that an empty office on Friday "looked bad." Leadership has also engaged in ethically bad and legally dubious practices by declaring all employees "essential workers" so that they can demand in-office work. They have also engaged in retaliation and demanded resignations. Philanthropy has a serious turnover problem. In an industry where the average tenure in a job is 1.5 years, Swedish had long beaten this curve. Many employees have been here 5 or more years. That is unlikely to continue with these recent changes. Multiple employees have already left, and more are actively looking for jobs. It doesn't matter how hard you work or how much money you raise. Your job is dependent upon you kissing up to the right people. Prospective employees beware.

Explore other reviews about Swedish

5.0
Jul 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company offered great flexibility- great manager

Cons

The floor I worked on was understaffed

2.0
Jul 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The perks/benefit working for this company is that first of all, they do their absolute best to uphold their culture or standards, to make sure that both patients and employees are being treated equally. Secondly, depending on what you do and in what department you are in, you will absolutely feel like the day is dragging by and just want to get out of there. But with the work environment I experienced, the coworkers I had were very social and had lots of great laughs. As far as training goes, when switching from one department to the other, the training was decent from one department lead not giving me much at all to work with and then putting me onto the floor right away, to somebody in the specialty department, who was very thorough and took time to teach you what you needed to learn.

Cons

As far as my experience with the downside of Swedish, I would say is management and the typical days at work. Management had their good sides to where I became great friends and close to a couple of managers, to the down side of where I had really bad issues with them. The major red flag for me was the micromanaging and screwing with my PTO requests. With my PTO requests, my previous clinical supervisor would approve the request, especially when it was a month out and I would get the email notifications telling me that it has been approved by that clinical supervisor. The huge issue when I was on vacation for couple of weeks, the supervisor told me that I did not have enough PTO for the second week and that it would be marked as unpaid time off. I did not have an issue with that until he/she called me the next day stating why I did not go to work and would be marked as a “no-call, no-show.” I was very confused until the supervisor told me that he/she did not approve my PTO request for that second week, only for the first. This was where I got frustrated and showed that it was approved by the supervisor and he/she stated that it was still in a “pending approval status,” and I have never heard of that the entire time I have been with this company. After everything, I got in trouble for no reason and was written up as my second write-up, not even a verbal warning, per policy. In the end, the main point from all of this in my experience, is that Swedish as a whole has been pretty good to me when it came to meeting new coworkers, having that fun & social environment and decent training (depending on the department). The other half of the company needing to improve on management needing to focus on more important things generally and not messing around with people’s PTO or time off when it has already been approved.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All