Pros
- There are a handful of talented employees that are committed to making a difference - Dogs? A fireplace? - Great pool of eligible single people if you're looking to dip your pen in the company ink
Cons
- T1 claims to champion innovation and inclusivity. Diversity of thought, background, and opinion are dismissed entirely. Worse, I observed instances where confidential peer review information was inappropriately shared among employees. - Opportunities for growth are completely subjective. Despite multiple requests, managers weren't able to share actionable plans for professional development and advancement. You're left spinning your wheels on repetitive work (branded vehicle wraps, anyone?) with little to no recognition for your work. Performance feedback is vague or nonexistent. Creativity and innovation take a backseat (pun intended) to tired cookie-cutter solutions. - Department leadership demonstrated a lack of vision and ineffective decision making. A textbook example of what not to do as a leader. Examples include excessive micromanagement across projects, hijacking opportunities for career growth to benefit personal image, dismissing constructive criticism despite claiming openness to feedback, playing favorites (especially those with male-dominated sports experience), and making promises about growth and development that never materialized. - Escalating issues to HR is futile. Truly pointless. Despite serious concerns with department leadership (outlined above), HR deferred my concerns back to management, failing to provide meaningful support or mediation. Actively facilitating an environment where employees feel trapped and unsupported making it clear they exist to protect their most incompetent leaders as opposed to their low and mid-level employees. - Comp is way below industry standard. You will be underpaid and underappreciated. If you are promoted, HR will not accept your counter-offer and will pressure you to sign on the dotted line. - The fact this company has a 4-star rating is baffling. It’s either the result of management padding reviews or HR hiring like-minded, toxically positive individuals who thrive in an echo chamber rather than prioritizing meaningful or innovative work.