Literally lost for words. - FRC Texas Capital Employee Review

2.0
Nov 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The salary is decent. The benefits aren’t terrible.

Cons

Oh my word. Where do I start. Welll, the bank has been around for 25 years and has not jumped on the technology train making it lack proficiency, efficiency & the ability to mitigate errors. The training is inferior. There are about 20 steps to complete simple transactions making it low quality service for the customers. There are also about 20 systems that need to be used for a single transaction instead of having a programmer install all of them into a single app for efficiency (which is doable as well as cost effective). You need approvals for EVERYTHING. I assumed I was working in an adult friendly environment and if you didn’t trust that I was experienced and trustworthy to do the job you should have hired less qualified employees that you can groom and micromanage. It’s actually quite insulting. They are trying to implement big banking practices without the resources to do so. They have branch associates doing things that a proper back office would handle (update your resumes because you are now qualified for so much more. You are definitely qualified for an analyst role at this point). As a community commercial bank trying to grow their retail division, they need to understand that they are not ready to have dual positions. There needs to be branch tellers and then FRCs. The branch teller can handle the operations while the QUALIFIED FRC generates business. At this point the branches are just brick and mortar customer service centers. You don’t have the foot traffic to operate the same way as a Chase, Wells Fargo or Regions. Therefore, you need to think about hiring professionals who have experience with denovo banks in new markets. With retail banking being a fairly new division, you need to think of it as a new bank.

Explore other reviews about Texas Capital

5.0
Apr 23, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pays well for hard work

Cons

Nothing it is a great firm

1.0
Mar 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some talented engineers and team members who try to do the right thing despite constant organizational friction.

Cons

The technology organization suffers from a lack of strong engineering leadership and accountability. Managers often avoid making firm technical or project decisions, which leads to shifting priorities and unclear direction. When initiatives struggle, responsibility is frequently pushed downward onto engineers rather than addressed at the leadership level. There has also been noticeable turnover across engineering teams while leadership continues pushing a model where only a small number of onshore “lead engineers” remain while much of the development work moves offshore. In practice this creates bottlenecks where engineers complete work during normal hours but cannot move code forward until offshore teams review and approve pull requests. Leadership has also introduced initiatives without realistic planning. When internal AI tooling was introduced, expectations around productivity were abruptly changed (for example, reducing story point estimates under the assumption AI would accelerate development). At the same time, engineering resources were directed toward building an internal AI assistant that largely functions as a wrapper around existing models while higher-priority platform work remains under-resourced. Culturally, the environment can feel dismissive toward engineers. Turnover remains high, concerns raised by teams are rarely addressed, and negative feedback about the organization has been consistent for years without meaningful change from upper management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All