Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      The Washington Post

      Engaged Employer

      The Washington Post reviews

      Marketing - Anonymous employee The Washington Post Employee Review

      3.0
      Oct 16, 2016
      Anonymous employee
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Great benefits; flexible work schedule; decent salary.

      Cons

      Very difficult to move up within the company. HR is hard to work with.

      avatar
      The Washington Post Response
      9y
      Thank you for the review and feedback. You are right! We strive to provide competitive benefits to our employees. Sorry you found it hard to move up within the company. Being a place where people can grow their career is important to us and we've passed on your feedback to our team. Thank you again for your feedback. We’d love to hear any other specifics you may have. Feel free to e-mail us: life@washpost.com.

      Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

      5.0
      May 12, 2026
      Intern
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

      Cons

      Nothing bad to say at all tbh

      1.0
      Jun 25, 2026
      Product designer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

      Cons

      The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: The Washington Post jobs | The Washington Post salaries | The Washington Post benefits | The Washington Post interviews
      The Washington Post reviewsThe Washington Post review