Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      The Washington Post

      Engaged Employer

      The Washington Post reviews

      The Post - Utility Worker The Washington Post Employee Review

      4.0
      Feb 20, 2018
      Utility worker
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      The pay at the Post was decent

      Cons

      Working 7 hour shifts (an average of 35hrs. per week) just so the company doesn't have to give you full time benefits

      avatar
      The Washington Post Response
      8y
      Thanks for taking the time to give us feedback. We take it very seriously and will pass it onto our team in Springfield. Thanks for being part of The Post team!

      Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

      5.0
      May 12, 2026
      Intern
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

      Cons

      Nothing bad to say at all tbh

      1.0
      Jun 25, 2026
      Product designer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

      Cons

      The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: The Washington Post jobs | The Washington Post salaries | The Washington Post benefits | The Washington Post interviews
      The Washington Post reviewsThe Washington Post Utility Worker reviewsThe Washington Post review