Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      The Washington Post

      Engaged Employer

      The Washington Post reviews

      Great workplace. - Staff Writer The Washington Post Employee Review

      5.0
      Sep 12, 2019
      Staff writer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good editors, great colleagues.

      Cons

      lower value given to older employees

      avatar
      The Washington Post Response
      6y
      Thanks for writing a review and for the kind words about the editors and staff of The Washington Post. The people are what makes this company great. You mentioned that "lower value" is given to "older employees." We take this seriously as we want The Post to be a great place to work for all. If you feel comfortable, feel free to confidentially e-mail us at life@washpost.com with more details. Thanks for being part of The Post team.

      Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

      5.0
      May 12, 2026
      Intern
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

      Cons

      Nothing bad to say at all tbh

      1.0
      Jun 25, 2026
      Product designer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

      Cons

      The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: The Washington Post jobs | The Washington Post salaries | The Washington Post benefits | The Washington Post interviews
      The Washington Post reviewsThe Washington Post Staff Writer reviewsThe Washington Post review