Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      The Washington Post

      Engaged Employer

      The Washington Post reviews

      A great place to work with a promising future, with some silos - Editor The Washington Post Employee Review

      4.0
      Jan 28, 2021
      Editor
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Generally very collaborative atmosphere, strong, thoughtful leadership, and great colleagues. Competitive benefits and room for growth.

      Cons

      It's a very large company with a long history, so there are many silos, especially between print, digital and business. The company is aware of this and working towards changing it, but it may take some time.

      avatar
      The Washington Post Response
      5y
      Thanks for your candid and honest review. Collaboration is key in continuing to break down silos and we're glad you've found collaboration strong. at The Washington Post. Glad you're part of the team!

      Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

      5.0
      May 12, 2026
      Intern
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

      Cons

      Nothing bad to say at all tbh

      1.0
      Jun 25, 2026
      Product designer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

      Cons

      The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: The Washington Post jobs | The Washington Post salaries | The Washington Post benefits | The Washington Post interviews
      The Washington Post reviewsThe Washington Post Editor reviewsThe Washington Post review