employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

This isn't really a machine learning engineer role - Machine Learning Engineer The Washington Post Employee Review

1.0
Oct 26, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of paid off-time: three weeks of vacation, three weeks of sick leave, one week of personal day + holiday.

Cons

The company has a multi-layer corporate America structure: from team lead to mangers to directors to VPs to CEO. Lots of internal politics, everyone just watch their own back to keep the job. The role itself is really a QA engineer, not ML engineer. For 85% of the time, you work on infrastructure migration, pipeline maintenance, and code improvement. You are constantly being hassled to meet the deadlines. For the 15% of ML, you are told what model to use, what code to write. Very boring!

Explore other reviews about The Washington Post

5.0
May 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

Cons

Nothing bad to say at all tbh

1.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

Cons

The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All