employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Is this your company?

Better than most. - Wildlife Biologist US Fish and Wildlife Service Employee Review

3.0
Feb 1, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fulfilling work. Helping to preserve wildlife habitat. Good people. High ideas.

Cons

Red tape. Ladder climbers. Dead end employees. Few permanent positions. Complicated and often corrupt hiring practices. Lack of support from upper management. Lack of funding. Office politics. Military service preference points. Lower pay than the equivalent position level in the private sector.

Explore other reviews about US Fish and Wildlife Service

5.0
Nov 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Admirable agency mission; many employees truly care about the resources, animals, ecosystems, etc. Good professional growth opportunities.

Cons

National wildlife refuge managers have too much unilateral power; there aren't enough checks and balances heading up the chain--and there's some lingering good 'ol boy-ism--so one bad manager can reverse years of community and conservation work and throw an entire refuge down the tubes.

3.0
Jan 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great if you're invested in the mission to conserve and restore ecosystems and wildlife populations; good benefits and work-life balance

Cons

Congressional meddling and changing priorities for initiatives at the regional level makes it extremely difficult to actually move the needle for species recovery. Now, with staff and budget cuts and changes in policies under the current administration, USFWS and the ESA are being de-fanged, defunded and deregulated to the benefit of private corporations and extractive industries (coal, oil & gas, mining). Internal morale has plummeted since Feb 2025.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All