Flexible scheduling but low pay and strict management - Pilot Crew Scheduler United Airlines Employee Review

3.0
Jun 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The job itself is easy enough, and the ability to trade shifts with co-workers allow for a solid amount of schedule flexibility. The job itself is seen as a “foot in the door” to other, better paying jobs in the NOC, and it often is.

Cons

One of the lowest paid positions in the NOC. The attendance policy is extremely strict, but not enforced equivocally. Scheduling is the only department in the company that requires you to stay in your position for 18 months before going to another department. However, if you want to stay in the department, management will constantly break that rule to promote people they like. Over 40 new hires in 2026 so it’s currently the blind leading the blind with training.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work schedule is very flexible with seniority

Cons

Have to be away from the family for few days in a row.

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All