it could be a great company - Flight Officer United Airlines Employee Review

1.0
Jun 14, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

flying airplanes, my great fellow employees, a great company with a great bit of history and the potential to do great things and have a bright future. I could be very proud again to fly for United Airlines if this company had a real leader and visionary at the helm.

Cons

it used to be a real career, but as long as things don't change drastically for the better, it's only a job. it's very sad for me to make such a statement,very sad. I used to be so very proud to be a United Pilot, but the last seven or so years of being treated like the enemy, being disregarded and not valued for any efforts, that just about did it. I fly my plane with top performance and motivation, that's what aviators do. For the company: they get job performance, not career performance. I used to promote United out of pride, now I only do it if you pay me for it... until you give me a reason to be proud again to fly for United.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All