It may be a bumpy ride. Fasten your seatbelts. - Administrative United Airlines Employee Review

2.0
Jul 4, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flight benefits are what keeps most people. The team I worked with were outstanding. The network of other admins was also an outstanding resource. But the changeover in management caused problems. Printing policies and info on the internet was also valuable.

Cons

Inconsistency on leadership. Had to fight to get good resources and training although the job itself was not difficult. In efforts to save costs, would not always staff adequately enough. Management playing favorites caused dissention and made having a union shop absolutely necessary for fair treatment. Also, their efforts to self-audit on accounting meant they really did not follow patterns that would allow anyone to actually know good profit and loss figures. It was an accountants nightmare or dream depending on how you looked at it.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flying benefits Great community of people Very diversed Cares about it’s people

Cons

Nothing that I can think of

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All