United Airlines-Supervisor! - Supervisor - Airport Operations United Airlines Employee Review

2.0
Feb 16, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most employees are dedicated to doing their job in a professional manner. On days when there are no issues, weather, ATC, aircraft damages, employee injuries, etc. the job is easy. It's a good job for those who don't want a 9 to 5 or to be confined to a desk.

Cons

The downside is that there is almost always some issue to resolve! That's basically why you have a job as a supervisor. The thing is the job gets very old and mundane because the problems are usually the same. ATC, weather, etc. The employee morale is also a big problem. Morale is down among all work groups, pilots, mechanics, agents, flight attendants, supervisors, etc. Senior management has done little to address the issues that began with a poor ESOP plan, 9/11 furloughs, pension termination, etc.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All