Good professional environment, but with some issues - Senior Analyst United Airlines Employee Review

3.0
May 12, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work/life balance. 40 hour work weeks are the norm for most salaried positions. Flight benefits are nice as long as your travel plans are very flexible. Pockets of good talent.

Cons

Pay is lower compared to other companies for similar roles and experience. All about supply and demand. There are a lot of people that want to work for United, and are willing to do so at a lower pay rate, and United knows that. Flight benefits are considered a form of financial compensation, and also a reason for lower salaries. United operates on a very thin margin, with expenses much higher than competitors. So when numbers don't come in good, reductions in force occur much too frequently. Recent reductions seem to be targeted at their older workforce, so they are losing a lot of wisdom and business knowledge. The remaining 20-somethings have been promoted to management levels, but have no clue on how to manage people or a business.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All