A great company with strong foundations. - Flight Attendant United Airlines Employee Review

4.0
Apr 28, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits Health/Dental/Eye Incentives and extra pay add up You can pretty much work whenever from wherever. Union representation saved our jobs during COVID, thanks to Sara Nelson. Great leadership

Cons

*Internal division due to merger of companies. *Very different standards in product. You may fly a brand new 787 Dreamliner with the latest technology one day, and then an obviously aging 737-700 the next. *As mentioned above, United does amazing in innovation such as their app, carbon footprint, and so forth, yet it’s still lagging their competitors in onboard product, wifi, entertainment, and connect-ability to the ground. *This job has the potential to change your life. You will experience things that most only dream of. It’s rewarding, freeing, spontaneous, and oh so fun. It is still a job though. They’ll be times of constant work, early wake-ups, drunk passengers, crying babies, difficult coworkers, and more. But it is honestly, the best job in the world and that’s why people don’t want to leave it. It’s a strong family.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All