UA is great place to have work/life balance, but reactive to fuel prices - Solutions Architect United Airlines Employee Review

3.0
Jul 28, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Able to work on your areas of interest. Used to be good Flight benefits, but now flights are almost full. UA provides 4-6% on 401k contributions Depending your boss, you can have flex schedule Organized and hierarchical management. Definitely, ISD will be heading in right direction with new CIO and it'll be totally different from earlier leadership. Upper leadership is changing with people who knows about technology.

Cons

No communication between management and employees. Uncertainty and no clear vision Too much of outsourcing and difficult to deal with vendors. Vendors are selected solely based on management's discretion. UA is very reactive to market conditions, there are lot of job cuts just to survive in the industry.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flying benefits Great community of people Very diversed Cares about it’s people

Cons

Nothing that I can think of

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All