It can be a decent job if you stick with it. - Anonymous employee United Airlines Employee Review

4.0
Sep 2, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Seniority is rewarded. As this is a union job/career- the flexibility and pay increases are automatic with the passing years. The benefits are truly amazing if you want, need, or love to travel. You can make this a career that works for you. It is more and more flexible and you can even have another career simultaneously. The job itself is actually very easy if you can deal with many people and personalities. This is why I stick with it.

Cons

The hours and schedule can be very exhausting. In the beginning, being on reserve and the low starting pay can tear you down physically, mentally, and emotionally. You need a strong resolve to get through the difficult first years. There are many opportunites to take breaks though through unpaid leaves. Take them as I did when you can and do something else to save your sanity. There is also a lot of management mess to deal with between the company and violations of our union contract. Hopefully some of these issues will be resolved with a new contract in the coming years.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All