Nepotism, Favoritism, low pay, bad schedules - Pilot Crew Scheduler United Airlines Employee Review

1.0
Mar 15, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flight benefits, pretty good health insurance

Cons

United is the opposite of meritocracy - it's the reason why it's the most unionized airline because management will always favor friends and family. Management in pilot scheduling is run by high school graduates that simply ingratiated themselves to a director with below-average intelligence to get promoted. The company markets itself as a progressive airline but behind the scenes is still run chiefly by boomers and their mentality to work. I had a colleague who was late to work and was in a car accident and they reprimanded him. You must look elsewhere if you're looking for flexibility, good pay, and time off. Of course, disregard if you're going to be working in corporate but realize they only give you 2 weeks vacation.

Explore other reviews about United Airlines

5.0
Jul 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

management cares about employees well being.

Cons

Hard to grow if you don't want to move to Chicago

3.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

United is genuinely a good place to work in a lot of ways. The dev side has strong leadership, the work is interesting, and there are real engineers doing real things. When I started, I was proud to tell people where I worked.

Cons

The Quality Engineering org has gone downhill fast since the leadership change about two years ago. It's hard to overstate how much the culture has shifted. The focus now is almost entirely on offshoring roles to India, and the US team has been quietly squeezed—people being nudged toward retirement, others suddenly finding themselves with negative performance feedback after years of solid work. It doesn't feel issue-driven, it feels like a headcount strategy with a polite cover story. On top of that, we spent most of last year implementing process changes that look impressive in a slide deck but don't actually move the needle. Meanwhile, the QE org has drifted away from what the dev leadership is actually trying to build. We're solving problems no one asked us to solve while the real priorities sit on the side. It's frustrating to watch, especially when you know what this team used to be capable of. The day-to-day environment has gotten noticeably toxic. People are checked out, the good ones are looking, and there's a real sense that institutional knowledge is being treated as disposable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All