employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

University Federal Credit Union

Engaged Employer

Only good if you know the right people - Anonymous employee University Federal Credit Union Employee Review

2.0
Dec 24, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, competitive pay, Tuition Reimbursement

Cons

Difficult to advance unless you know the right people, limited work/life balance, certain depts are very slow and limited when it becomes to improving processes; Company's technology is lackluster

avatar
University Federal Credit Union Response
7y
Thank you for providing us with your feedback. We are happy to hear that you are enjoying our benefits, competitive pay, and tuition reimbursement programs. We are interested to hear about the innovative ideas you have about growth, development, and improving processes as we continually strive to make enhancements. Feel free to reach us at HumanResources@ufcu.org to discuss further. Thank you!

Explore other reviews about University Federal Credit Union

5.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Leadership, Clear Company Vision, Common Goal within organization. Good incentive, Great Benefits. Well respected organization in the area. GREAT communication from CEO!

Cons

Some processes needed to be upgraded, or just focused on. Busy teller branches often carried the load, and were not compensated for that. You could transfer to a slow branch and get the same pay for less work.

2.0
Jun 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Credit union movement is genuinely concerned with helping consumers; their heart is in the right place...however...

Cons

Senior management is clueless as to what motivates employees. It's a "let them eat cake" mentality. Completely inept "Chief" Marketing Officer has an extraordinarily large inferiority complex that masks itself as machismo; the Chief HR Officer is only interested in building her internal empire--no leadership skills whatsoever. Both have lost significant employees over the last year due to their lack of ability to lead. CEO is genuinely a nice person, but he refuses to listen to anyone--only his ideas are the good ones. They're WAY behind on product innovation and only really seem to be interested in naming stadiums and not making a difference in the communities they serve.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All