employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

University Federal Credit Union

Engaged Employer

They would listen to your ideas and were very helpful in training. - Anonymous employee University Federal Credit Union Employee Review

5.0
Jan 20, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked here as a temp for 7 months in the collections dept. This was a contract position and if I hadn't relocated to Florida I'm sure they would have hired me in. They were very good in the training dept. and excellent on the wages. They had meetings continously to discuss problem areas and gave employees incentives. I would apply there again if I moved back to the area.

Cons

People in the collections dept. had to work evenings. I guess they needed someone to as we did business in other time zones.

Explore other reviews about University Federal Credit Union

5.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Leadership, Clear Company Vision, Common Goal within organization. Good incentive, Great Benefits. Well respected organization in the area. GREAT communication from CEO!

Cons

Some processes needed to be upgraded, or just focused on. Busy teller branches often carried the load, and were not compensated for that. You could transfer to a slow branch and get the same pay for less work.

2.0
Jun 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Credit union movement is genuinely concerned with helping consumers; their heart is in the right place...however...

Cons

Senior management is clueless as to what motivates employees. It's a "let them eat cake" mentality. Completely inept "Chief" Marketing Officer has an extraordinarily large inferiority complex that masks itself as machismo; the Chief HR Officer is only interested in building her internal empire--no leadership skills whatsoever. Both have lost significant employees over the last year due to their lack of ability to lead. CEO is genuinely a nice person, but he refuses to listen to anyone--only his ideas are the good ones. They're WAY behind on product innovation and only really seem to be interested in naming stadiums and not making a difference in the communities they serve.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All