employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

University Federal Credit Union

Engaged Employer

Great credit union but could benefit from a few tweaks - Anonymous employee University Federal Credit Union Employee Review

4.0
Nov 9, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good opportunities to learn different roles doing job rotations. Incentives are great compared to many other financial institutions. Company seems eager to improve technology for members. If you are local to the Austin area there are a lot of social events to get to network. Company aims to keep everyone updated on changes and events.

Cons

Vacation and sick time has to be accrued before it can be used. Other institutions allow you to take vacation immediately upon hire. HSA employer contribution is low compared to big banks. No assistance offered to assist with drop-in childcare as with a bigger institution. Your only hope for advancement depends on whether your manager wants to advocate for you. Systems could use a major update. Your management team is hit or miss.

Explore other reviews about University Federal Credit Union

5.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Leadership, Clear Company Vision, Common Goal within organization. Good incentive, Great Benefits. Well respected organization in the area. GREAT communication from CEO!

Cons

Some processes needed to be upgraded, or just focused on. Busy teller branches often carried the load, and were not compensated for that. You could transfer to a slow branch and get the same pay for less work.

2.0
Jun 19, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Credit union movement is genuinely concerned with helping consumers; their heart is in the right place...however...

Cons

Senior management is clueless as to what motivates employees. It's a "let them eat cake" mentality. Completely inept "Chief" Marketing Officer has an extraordinarily large inferiority complex that masks itself as machismo; the Chief HR Officer is only interested in building her internal empire--no leadership skills whatsoever. Both have lost significant employees over the last year due to their lack of ability to lead. CEO is genuinely a nice person, but he refuses to listen to anyone--only his ideas are the good ones. They're WAY behind on product innovation and only really seem to be interested in naming stadiums and not making a difference in the communities they serve.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All