employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Valerio Architects

Is this your company?

Good team and office organization. Boring projects and low compensation and benefits. - Studio Associate Valerio Architects Employee Review

3.0
Jan 23, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly environment, office location, opportunities inside the company. Standard and predictable projects if you’re interested in that. Good office organization. Juniors will find a nice place to start in the industry.

Cons

Non-flexible hours, some antiquated office and PTO policies. Projects are very repetitive. Low compensation compared to other firms.

Explore other reviews about Valerio Architects

5.0
Jan 1, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The team is full of dedicated professionals of all levels. We handle nationwide projects with well-known brands. The projects are challenging and fast paced, team members get to see the process from start to finish. Valerio has grown recently expanding our international offices, New York City and Los Angeles teams and we look forward to Valerio’s 30th anniversary 2024. The team is a truly a great group and very focused.

Cons

This is fast paced and detail oriented work. It is not a con specifically but I wanted to note it for anyone who is not motivated or does not want to be challenged to stay away. Valerio very much promotes from within so it is a great place to start young and grow in the profession.

1
2.0
Jul 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you’re early in your career or looking to get your foot in the door, this can be a decent place to gain experience and build your resume.

Cons

In my experience, the company suffered from excessive micromanagement. Many executives appeared to spend the majority of their time in meetings while remaining disconnected from the day-to-day work. Decisions were often slow, priorities changed frequently, and employees had little autonomy to do their jobs effectively. Compensation was another major concern. I felt salaries were not competitive with the workload and expectations, and there was little transparency around pay or opportunities for meaningful increases. I also had concerns about the company's wage classification practices. It seemed that many employees were classified as salaried even though, based on my understanding of their roles and responsibilities, some may have been more appropriately classified as hourly. I would encourage prospective employees to understand how their position will be classified and whether it aligns with applicable labor laws. Finally, I was concerned that the company appeared to rely heavily on employees working under employment visas in positions that, in my opinion, were compensated below market rates. While I cannot speak to the company's intentions, the overall impression was that this practice contributed to lower wages across all roles.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All