Under new leadership: Now an exciting, fair, and friendly environment where one with talent and drive can flourish. - Anonymous employee Verisk Employee Review

4.0
Feb 21, 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Health care fraud is on the rise and criminals who perpetrate it have become organized and sophisticated. It's exciting to work for a company that tackles fraud, waste, and abuse in health care, dental, oncology, facility, RxI, and provider arenas. It's also rewarding to work with cutting edge technology with real-time editing, in-depth fraud analytics and clinical review. Suspect claims and billing patterns are reviewed by medical, coding & investigative experts using predictive analytics and robust databases.

Cons

Work / Life balance for some is difficult to find, especially in the IT area. With the entry of a new President (late 2011), there is greater focus and it is definitely less chaotic.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All