Not So Great - Principal Engineer Verisk Employee Review

3.0
Feb 2, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance No weekend buzz from Managers A small-medium level MNC

Cons

Low packages compared to market level. Monitoring time spent in office based on swipe in/out. No added benefits. RTO/Hybrid/5-day-week office Some teams doesn't have good learning curve. No stocks, nothing extra given

avatar
Verisk Response
2y
We appreciate you sharing your thoughts on your experience at Verisk. First, I'm so glad to hear you had a positive work-life balance experience. We are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. That being said, when it comes to compensation and benefits packages, our work is never done. We constantly strive to offer fair and competitive pay to ensure they align with industry standards. Additionally, we respects to our high level managers, our leadership team is open to feedback and suggestions; this is part of our commitment to learning, caring, and results and a foundation of the way we work. Again, we sincerely appreciate your feedback about your experience at Verisk. If you have more feedback you’d like to discuss, we encourage you to contact your HRBP.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jul 1, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All