Stable company but no competitive pay - Engineering Manager Verisk Employee Review

3.0
Apr 24, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability Polite Work environment Great year bonus Medical insurance Time flexibility

Cons

Slow professional career growth No competitive salaries No 100% WFH

avatar
Verisk Response
2y
Hello, thanks for sending us your insights. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your experience working with us. Your acknowledgment of our positive work environment is inspiring. We are glad you were happy with your compensation package, and specifically our medical insurance and yearly bonuses. We appreciate your feedback on work-life balance at Verisk, specifically our WFH policies. Maintaining a healthy work-life balance is crucial for our employees. Currently, we offer a hybrid work environment that allows our employees the flexibility to both work from home and connect with fellow employees. If you have specific suggestions on how we can enhance life at Verisk, please feel free to share them with your manager or HRBP or through our internal feedback channels, such as the Employee Engagement Survey.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Cons

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All