employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Vertex Pharmaceuticals

Engaged Employer

Survival of the Fakest - Executive Director Vertex Pharmaceuticals Employee Review

2.0
Apr 3, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only thing Vertex has going for it is its science. The company is successful despite itself. Unfortunately the EC can't get out of its own way, nor can the countless senior leaders who all waste time, resources and employees' sanity pandering to them. Longstanding Vertexians, and those who do well managing up to longstanding Vertexians, will do well. It's hands down survival of the fakest.

Cons

The performance review cycle is an absolute joke. Stakeholder feedback is completely anonymous, which is fantastic for a company that operates on talking secrets about its employees behind their backs, and then lets them go for "underperforming" when there was never a word uttered to that employee nor an opportunity to improve ever truly given. Like that? You'll also love that in cases of a 'Building' rating, one where improvement is needed, you are also not guaranteed an actual written performance review that articulates the ways in which you didn't meet your primary work objectives. Even better when the company's own analytic tools provided demonstrate that you met and/or exceeded all but one. From what I have seen and experienced, HR can't even treat their own employees with respect or integrity through this process.

avatar
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Response
2y
Hello, thank you for your candor. We take current and former employee feedback seriously, and will share your review with HR.

Explore other reviews about Vertex Pharmaceuticals

5.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly coworkers; competent people; flexible

Cons

lack of growth plan for new grads

2.0
Jul 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Compensation -Benefits -Smart and capable co-workers make the day to day easier to navigate

Cons

-Poor leadership (specifically in the Quality organization). - Leadership does not lead by example - It's not unusual to observe a Quality VP or Sr.director taking screenshots of Teams chats (for CYA?). I question the level of trust (in both directions). This behavior creates a toxic environment. - Quality role scope creep- leadership tries to "own" and/or oversee the activities of other departments outside the scope of their QA responsibility which makes execution of processes cumbersome and, in many cases, non-value added and confusion over responsibility ownership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All