employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Virginia-Georgia Transformer

Is this your company?

Great Company with challenging opportunities, enthusiastic employees, great learning environment - Anonymous employee Virginia-Georgia Transformer Employee Review

4.0
Aug 15, 2012
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Rapid growth, great co- workers, challenging opportunites, exciting place to work, something new to learn on a daily basis, support from management and co workers, training opportunites, Roanoke good city for families, good school systems, educational reimbursement, benefits, great financial stability, employee lunches, company picnic and

Cons

some minor micro management, Roanoke is a small city, office is a bit out of the center of the city, hard to get in and out during rush hour,

Explore other reviews about Virginia-Georgia Transformer

5.0
May 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great product, good location, quality

Cons

The dead lines are crazy

1.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing I can say about

Cons

The current organizational structure reflects serious gaps in leadership capability, technical understanding, and workplace culture. In several key positions, individuals with limited technical background and communication skills are placed in critical roles such as Testing Head, Quality Head, and Production Supervision. This creates a disconnect between engineering requirements and decision-making at the operational level. The environment is further affected by high internal politics across multiple levels of the organization. Instead of addressing root causes, issues are often deflected between departments, with individuals prioritizing self-protection and maintaining their image in front of ownership rather than resolving engineering and production challenges. A significant concern is the lack of alignment between management decisions and engineering realities. Operational constraints, production challenges, and technical workflows are frequently misunderstood or overlooked, particularly due to a strong bias toward cost and procurement perspectives rather than end-to-end engineering execution. Additionally, the work environment has become increasingly challenging for engineering professionals. Many experienced engineers have chosen to leave the organization after securing long-term stability opportunities, and there is limited willingness among them to return due to the prevailing work culture. Overall, the combination of weak technical leadership, excessive internal politics, and misaligned priorities has created an environment that is not conducive to sustainable engineering excellence or employee retention.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All