employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Virginia-Georgia Transformer

Is this your company?

A company that competes by a psuedo-prison philosophy. - Anonymous employee Virginia-Georgia Transformer Employee Review

2.0
Sep 26, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I love the work itself, and I get along great with my coworkers.

Cons

Most salaried employees make 15-30% less than their market value dictates. VTC manages to retain good employees by using dirty tricks in US immigration law by getting highly skilled employees under the L1 visa. Under this particular visa, VTC will sponsor immigrants to come to the US to work here. However, if that employee wants to quit, he loses his sponsorship and is deported - hence employees quit very rarely, even if they hate the company they work for. Because the employees have no cards to bargain with (they certainly can't just find work at a better company) VTC doesn't have to pay competitive wages to keep good employees around.It is interesting that a good immigration reform policy by the government could literally devastate this company. For myself, I make $12,000 less than an entry level professional would in the same industry (and I'm NOT entry level). I plan to make every effort to remove myself from the company when I am capable of doing so.

Explore other reviews about Virginia-Georgia Transformer

5.0
May 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great product, good location, quality

Cons

The dead lines are crazy

1.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nothing I can say about

Cons

The current organizational structure reflects serious gaps in leadership capability, technical understanding, and workplace culture. In several key positions, individuals with limited technical background and communication skills are placed in critical roles such as Testing Head, Quality Head, and Production Supervision. This creates a disconnect between engineering requirements and decision-making at the operational level. The environment is further affected by high internal politics across multiple levels of the organization. Instead of addressing root causes, issues are often deflected between departments, with individuals prioritizing self-protection and maintaining their image in front of ownership rather than resolving engineering and production challenges. A significant concern is the lack of alignment between management decisions and engineering realities. Operational constraints, production challenges, and technical workflows are frequently misunderstood or overlooked, particularly due to a strong bias toward cost and procurement perspectives rather than end-to-end engineering execution. Additionally, the work environment has become increasingly challenging for engineering professionals. Many experienced engineers have chosen to leave the organization after securing long-term stability opportunities, and there is limited willingness among them to return due to the prevailing work culture. Overall, the combination of weak technical leadership, excessive internal politics, and misaligned priorities has created an environment that is not conducive to sustainable engineering excellence or employee retention.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All