No room for contributing to company goals - Project Manager Yardzen Employee Review

1.0
Sep 28, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Their business model allows them to offer affordable garden design to an underserved market.

Cons

The owners are micro-managers. They've hired a small number of professional garden designers and landscape architects, but have them doing menial tasks and not allowing them to contribute their many years of experience to benefit company goals.

avatar
Yardzen Response
3y
We are sorry to hear this is your experience at Yardzen. Your experience does not reflect the experience we strive to create for employees. As a current employee, we encourage you to complete our anonymous feedback form, our Employee Pulse survey which launches in early December, and/or connect with a member of our People Ops team to find a solution together.

Explore other reviews about Yardzen

5.0
Apr 8, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great place to work. It’s a startup so expect to work hard and have your role evolve as the business evolves. I work with highly talented people that I am able to learn from each day. The owners are approachable and kind. They are working hard to ensure their business succeeds.

Cons

Thins can be chaotic but these are uncertain times and everyone is working hard!

1.0
Jun 10, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They are a remote-first company and have great benefits

Cons

Work-life balance is virtually nonexistent. Employees are expected to wear multiple hats, but the expectation goes far beyond normal startup culture. Taking on additional responsibilities is treated as the baseline, and those who question the workload or push back are often made to feel like they are not committed enough. The company lacks basic structure, clear ownership, and effective processes. Despite ongoing operational issues, there is little willingness to implement feedback or make meaningful improvements. Teams are often left wondering why projects are stalled when the underlying problems have been identified repeatedly. Leadership frequently changes direction with little warning, making it difficult to execute any long-term strategy. Teams can spend days or weeks working on projects only to have priorities suddenly shift and their work discarded. This creates a cycle of wasted effort, frustration, and low morale. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic. Instead of following a clear plan, priorities can change based on the moment, leaving employees constantly adjusting to the latest pivot. Hiring, promotion, and workforce decisions lack transparency and consistency. The company has, at times, lost employees who were critical to the success of the business, while retaining or elevating individuals whose contributions were less clear. This has contributed to turnover, knowledge loss, and declining confidence in leadership. Overall, the company talks about growth and innovation, but the lack of structure, process, planning, and stable leadership makes it difficult for employees and teams to succeed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All