Pros
the colleagues I work with are the best
Cons
Announcing major HR and benefits changes just weeks before the end of the year is a poor decision that shows no regard for employees’ time, planning, or financial reality. These changes don’t exist in a vacuum—they come after years of stagnant pay for many US employees, making it clear that leadership is comfortable shifting more costs and risk onto employees rather than addressing compensation. The PTO policy updates are being framed positively, but the real-world impact tells a very different story. “Use It or Lose It” PTO (Starting 1/1/2026): Calling this a move that supports well-being feels out of touch. Many teams are already stretched thin, and workloads routinely make it difficult to take time off. Removing rollover means employees will predictably lose PTO they earned, simply because the job does not allow them to use it. This is a clear reduction in flexibility and total compensation, regardless of how it’s branded. Elimination of PTO Payout in Certain States: Ending payout for unused PTO upon separation—particularly in states like Texas—strips away a benefit employees reasonably viewed as part of their compensation. This change lowers the value of the benefits package and sends a clear message about how little departing employees are valued. Pay Stagnation Undermines Any Claim of “Growth” These benefit reductions land at the same time many US employees continue to see flat wages year after year. Morale has suffered as employees observe what appears to be uneven investment across teams, with some international groups receiving raises or bonuses while US compensation remains largely unchanged. Leadership messaging about future growth and profitability rings hollow when that growth does not translate into raises, especially while benefits are being scaled back and workloads remain high. Healthcare Costs Push Employees Further Backward Rising healthcare premiums only add to the frustration: PPO premiums increased by roughly 18% HSA premiums increased by roughly 24% Maintaining a 65% company contribution does not offset the reality that employees are paying significantly more out of pocket. For anyone without a raise that matches inflation and benefit increases, this is effectively a pay cut going into 2026. Return-to-Office and Monitoring Signals the Real Priorities The push toward return-to-office expectations, combined with discussions about implementing an employee monitoring system, makes leadership’s priorities feel unmistakably clear. While employees are being asked to absorb reduced benefits, higher healthcare costs, and stagnant pay, time and money are being directed toward oversight and control rather than compensation, flexibility, or trust. Instead of addressing workload, burnout, or retention, these moves reinforce the sense that visibility and monitoring are being valued more than employee outcomes. For many, this further erodes confidence that leadership understands—or cares about—the day-to-day realities facing US employees. Compounding all of this is the CEO’s constant company-wide messaging, which increasingly feels disconnected from reality. Repeated statements about stepping back or changing leadership style have not matched day-to-day behavior. Instead, employees experience continued micromanagement and frequent emails outside normal working hours—including weekends and holidays. Rather than signaling trust or focus on employee well-being, this pattern reinforces a culture of constant availability and pressure to work more, even as compensation and benefits are being reduced. For many employees, this feels less like leadership and more like another way to demand more work while offering less in return. Taken together, these decisions—last-minute policy changes, reduced PTO value, rising healthcare costs, and continued pay stagnation—have seriously damaged morale employees. Total compensation is shrinking, not growing, and leadership appears disconnected from the impact of these choices on the people doing the work. If retaining experienced US employees is a goal, these decisions are actively working against it.
