A Hot Mess - Private Equity rex Employee Review

1.0
Nov 25, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly, down-to-earth people throughout the organization. No egos. Hard workers. Team players.

Cons

My bottom line advice to anyone considering working for Rex is to run away as fast as possible, especially if you’re looking at jobs in their real estate private equity or tech groups. The Rex senior management team is uncommunicative, impatient, short-sighted, and impulsive. And they make very poor decisions. They offer zero transparency about their plans for the company, nor about strategic direction. They have also grossly miscalculated real estate capital markets trends, and have been scrambling to raise capital for their new deals, resorting to cold calling thousands of investors. There are a few reviews on this site that seem to be planted by company insiders, commenting on how the company is fast-paced and always changing, and that people who are slower/hesitant to change ways will find the company frustrating. Nonsense. The people they hire are quality people, but they’re left hanging out to dry by senior management. There’s a reason there’s a constantly revolving door of people at the company, and it’s not because those people were afraid of change or couldn’t work at a fast pace. It’s because management, particularly in the real estate private equity and tech groups, doesn’t know what they’re doing. They also refuse to engage with deeper pocketed investors, because they don't want to let those investors have a say in how the properties are managed. But not engaging with larger investors makes it hard for the company close deals, to raise capital, and to grow their real estate portfolio. In tech, they have built a handful of “companies” (more like products) that haven’t scaled or even acquired new customers in years. One more thing to add. Senior management is cheap. They want most of their employees to be in the Austin area, but they refuse to pay for office space and maintain an outdated work from anywhere policy. Meanwhile, collaboration, mentorship, communication, and transparency all suffer. In short, Rex hires great people, but they put them in a position to fail.

Explore other reviews about rex

5.0
May 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission-Driven, Not Just Marketing: Most companies have values on a wall, but here, we actually live them. We dedicate real company time to dissecting our mission and discussing how it impacts our daily work. It’s raw, honest, and better than any culture I’ve experienced elsewhere. Meritocracy: There is massive opportunity from tech and ops to investments within real estate. The company genuinely invests in employee development and rewards you based on your production, output and potential, not just what’s on your resume. The Invictus Mentality: We are relentless. The environment is high-performance; we take our lumps, learn from them, and keep moving forward. It’s a culture of winning.

Cons

High Intensity: The "Invictus" mindset isn't for everyone. If you aren't comfortable with a fast-paced environment where you're expected to learn quickly from setbacks, you might find the pace challenging.

1.0
Apr 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work from home environment

Cons

- Despite being positioned as a tech company, the organization operates primarily as a real estate company with very limited understanding of how to build and sell a tech product. The product itself is not market ready and BDRs are set up to fail from the start. - Leadership is highly micromanaging and deflects blame downward when results don't materialize, rather than acknowledging fundamental product and market fit issues. - Performance expectations were not clearly defined or communicated in writing during onboarding. Targets appeared to shift retroactively. - There appears to be a pattern of hiring BDRs with promises of growth and commission, then terminating around the 90 day mark when the product fails to generate interest — regardless of individual effort. - Resources provided to do the job were extremely limited. When concerns were raised, the response was essentially to figure it out independently. - No formal review process or structured feedback before termination. Issues were raised for the first time at or near the point of firing. - Compensation structure including guaranteed commission was not handled transparently after separation.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All