Promising fast-moving startup - Anonymous employee rideOS Employee Review

5.0
Jan 15, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Experienced team with relevant track record, fast-moving, clear product-market fit, Sequoia-backed, employees have a ton of autonomy, endless list of interesting tech challenges, located in SF.

Cons

There is a lot to build and a ton of work, the idea is good so competition is gearing up, the industry is experiencing very large changes and the future and who will win is anyone's guess.

Explore other reviews about rideOS

5.0
Feb 24, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

By far the best start-up I've worked at. They really care about their employees, and are compassionate to each person's individual needs. During this past covid year, they adapted to work-from-home quite seamlessly. The benefits are pretty generous for a start-up, including a weekly lunch budget, good leave and PTO policies. People are very motivated to succeed, but also understand work-life balance. I never feel pressured to work on weekends or late, unless there is some emergency. Overall, the leadership is forward-thinking, optimistic, and encouraging.

Cons

No 401k matching (it is a small start-up, to be fair). High likelihood to pivot to something new mid-project. Not a con for everyone, but need to be able to work in a rapidly changing environment.

5.0
Jan 31, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Growth-focused: Leadership encourages individual contributors to grow themselves in addition to contributing to areas of the company that they feel is important. Feedback oriented culture: I've felt that I've been able to give and receive feedback safely with my immediate team, and with things that I don't work on often. Fast-paced and agile: Problems that we've faced were dealt with quickly and efficiently. As an engineer this means I get to wear many hats and must stay flexible.

Cons

Not enough bottoms-up decision making or empowerment. A lot of raw information, not enough synthesized information. Not as much collaboration on eng / prod side

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All