employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Environmental Protection Agency

Is this your company?

Environmental Protection Agency reviews

4.0

72% would recommend to a friend

(998 total reviews)
avatar

Andrew Wheeler

34% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

Environmental Protection Agency has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 998 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Environmental Protection Agency employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government & Public Administration industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

998 reviews
3.0
Jun 18, 2015

Office of Research and Development: Some outstanding people

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some really great people and offers the ability to work on diverse and interesting projects. Great place to get feet wet as a young employee.

Cons

Difficult to advance professionally. Management faces extreme challenges and the effects get passed down.

3.0
Feb 20, 2015

An escape from the golden shackles.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

People who work there value interpersonal relationships between staff, generally have the right attitude about its goals and priorities, and seek to do more with less including giving their all even when it damages them over time. I learned a lot, became a better person, and genuinely was tested and tempered through my rise through the ranks. Job security was also a huge benefit. Work/life balance is great, even if often abused by senior management and those who can hide their grift. Benefits are very good, although they are based on seniority and being willing to ask for them.

Cons

The agency is hamstrung by outdated values and hierarchy that doesn't serve it any longer. Politics on a local and national level determine goals and values instead of its core mission. A shrinking budget that doesn't allow hiring top talent nor allows the removal of dead weight is causing cancerous growth to appear in the workforce as top talent leaves the grifters for better pastures. Furthermore, with the recent slow down and regretful turn to subjugated following to Congressional whims and top politician sway, the agency is teetering on becoming less relevant and useful to the American people. Job security was sometimes more important than actually doing the work the agency is capable of doing, thus bringing uncertainty to why people are working there among the staff or, worse, actual undermining of helpful programs and agency actions by its own staff. Career advancement is nearly impossible, there are no plans for growth or succession in place, and workload is increasing substantially while knowledgeable staff is literally being paid to leave in droves to avoid furloughs. This is causing consternation and fear among staff as well as causing younger talent to be placed in positions where they will either fail or become burned out for being merely "successful" in unclear roles and undefined positions that have no clear benefit to the agency's core mission. Pay is usually acceptable, but it's also clear that pay is not standardized among similar positions so while one person might receive a large amount of money for little demonstrable effort and deliverables another who delivers constantly above and beyond might receive significantly less than what the private sector would provide. It is also clear that it isn't what you do but who you know if you want a pay raise, appearance is more important than actual work, and accountability is nearly non-existent encouraging a culture of doing the bare minimum. Management below senior level readily admits to these problems but literally shrugs their shoulders and claims "that's the way it is" and "I know and I agree, but nothing can be done". Staff can literally break the law, and if they are senior enough, they won't even be talked to about it. I have received physical threats and been nearly beaten by people for merely requesting they follow the same rules and procedures as the rest of the staff who are not as senior as them. Senior management is generally non-existent. They are in eight hour long meetings where it is unclear what they are doing, making an effort to appear they are working while leaving early everyday, or actually not showing up to work or being available when they say they are without any actual accountability or oversight due to their "leadership". Employee satisfaction has fallen dramatically, trust in senior management has degraded to Congress approval level bad, and continued resource cuts and an aging staff are quickly making the agency irrelevant to current challenges the nation and our world faces.

3.0
Feb 18, 2015

Frustrating place to work...mostly because of wasted potential.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you want to be a public servant, the mission is pretty outstanding (protecting human health and the environment). Many of the staff are very smart, very committed, very passionate. If flexibility is your thing, then you have flexible schedule, work at home, great leave.

Cons

Management is generally unable and unwilling to manage the expectations of political appointees. Employees and management are more adverse to change than private sector. Shrinking resources and expanding workload means you'll get more work (and usually not the projects you want) if you are a high performer. Limited mobility and promotion seems predetermined-it is a misconception that once you are in, you can move around-this is virtually impossible.

Viewing 61 - 63 of 998 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,292 Environmental Protection Agency reviews submitted anonymously by Environmental Protection Agency employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Environmental Protection Agency is right for you.