FHI 360 reviews

4.0

83% would recommend to a friend

(808 total reviews)

Tessie San Martin, PhD, MS

91% approve of CEO

50% positive business outlook

FHI 360 has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 808 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The FHI 360 employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

808 reviews
4.0
Apr 5, 2025

Great organization

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I work with incredible people who strive daily to ensure everyone has access to various services, and the organization provides excellent benefits.

Cons

I don’t see any cons. It’s unfortunate how the organization is impacted by the budget cut.

1.0
Apr 3, 2025

Serious concerns

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Global, mission driven multi-sector organization

Cons

While FHI 360 presents itself as a mission-driven organization committed to equity and global development, for years, experience revealed a deeply troubling internal culture that contradicts the values it outwardly espouses. Despite marketing efforts to position the organization as inclusive and values-aligned, the reality within is marked by toxic workplace dynamics, discriminatory practices, and unethical leadership behavior—particularly at the senior levels. The environment is particularly harmful for women and people of color, many of whom have been sidelined, undermined, or targeted without accountability. Concerns raised about racism, harassment, and retaliation are routinely ignored or dismissed. Leadership, particularly at the COO and CSO levels, has cultivated a culture of fear, insecurity, and sabotage. Instead of fostering growth and collaboration, they compete with staff, take credit for others’ work without attribution, and reward allegiance over competence or integrity. Despite well-meaning intentions from the CEO, her continued reliance on senior leaders who actively harm employees without consequence speaks to a serious failure in accountability and ethical oversight. DEI is deprioritized internally, even while being touted externally. The organization also undertook downsizing efforts in a phased manner—well before the current donor funding landscape shifted. These reductions in force were poorly managed, lacking transparency, fairness, and strategy. Many capable and committed employees were let go without clear rationale, imbalanced packages, while underperforming or harmful individuals in positions of power remained protected. FHI 360 may lead impactful programs and issue bold mission statements, but its treatment of staff—particularly the most marginalized—revealed a deeply broken internal culture. True impact cannot be realized without first taking accountability for your actions, and cultivating a healthy, safe, and equitable workplace. Until serious structural and leadership changes are made, this cannot be recommended as a supportive or ethical place to work.

2.0
Apr 3, 2025

Just a number

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote work, prior to cuts the benefits were great and work was spread equally

Cons

Teams are skeleton crews but programs and leadership expect higher output with more workload placed on team members. There is no transparency with the USG issues and cash flow issues.

Viewing 61 - 63 of 808 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,005 FHI 360 reviews submitted anonymously by FHI 360 employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FHI 360 is right for you.