FactSet QA Automation Engineer reviews

3.0

88% would recommend to a friend

(9 total reviews)
avatar

Phil Snow and Sanoke Viswanathan

100% approve of CEO

94% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

9 reviews
5.0
May 27, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are many Pros: 1. Good work-life balance. 2. Appraisal twice a year. 3. Friendly and supportive colleagues and management. 4. Yearly cultural fest on a grand scale. 5. Yearly hackathon and other competitions. 6. Subsidized meals and free evening snacks/breakfast as per your shift timings. 7. Free of cost transportation.

Cons

I've been working in FactSet for 1 yr and didn't find any cons as such.

2.0
May 25, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good canteen Free snacks Free soft drinks Nice hardware is given to employes

Cons

I was hired from industry as automation engineer to be part of the QA of the main product of factset. My journey so far has been full of surprises and disbeliefs about the things that happen in this team Automation they have implemented is a disaster. Joke is a very small word to use in order to describe it. Technically incapable and incompetent people are put in place as automation leads. They do not let people from industry do anything to improve automation, nor they have the capability to do it on their own. They are more worried about job security hence do not let new people with outside experience change things to improve and overshadow them. About people management aspect, there is absolutely no process or professional approach. There are certain individuals who are at team leader level in QA Analyst teams. They do not have minimum communication skills, product knowledge, QA knowledge and management skills. They have established strong ties with associate directors and senior directors/SVPs from US office in this QA team and influence them. They consistently do not follow of process and professionalism. People in local QA manager position in this team are hired from outside, and come with strong testing and automation background. But the team leaders bypass the managers to go to Associate Directors and Senior Directors/SVPs in US office, for all matters. The Associate Directors and Senior Director/SVPs are intentionally entertaining these team leaders. Senior director level people in my SBU QA team are very good as people, but are underskilleed. They spent a decade in the company to build good relations with top management and grown to senior director/SVP level. They do not have QA skills, management skills, and lack automation and computer science background. Because of the lack of skillset, they are being regularly fooled by few individuals in the team

2.0
May 10, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good place to start your career but staying for more than 2 years is not recommended. Felxi-Shift hours based on business needs New campus is under-construction and could expect a better amenities Flexible holidays

Cons

Firing has become a common trend No respect for senior employees Higher management don't want to retain people neither they want you to come back Work from home is just on papers No work life balance Health insurance for a group you get is just a peanut High resource curnch but managers don't care and waiting for right moment to fire existing employees too No collaboration and teams want to work in isolation Policies are not transparent and is not made available to all employees Open door policy is a Joke

Viewing 7 - 9 of 9 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,546 FactSet reviews submitted anonymously by FactSet employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FactSet is right for you.