Fannie Mae reviews

3.6

57% would recommend to a friend

(2,555 total reviews)
avatar

Peter Akwaboah

43% approve of CEO

40% positive business outlook

Fannie Mae has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 2,555 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Fannie Mae employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
3.0
Mar 9, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Benefits Above average pay Good opportunities for training Great diverse environment Co-workers tend to be very smart/intelligent

Cons

3 months into starting, there was a massive layoff that affected some people on my team. For anyone starting with a new company, this is a huge red flag. 6 months later, a new round of layoffs, a year later another. Seriously? Even after being profitable? Office politics. Those dumb calibrations. For anyone that works at the main office, the refrigerators are like 100 years old and feel unsanitary.

3.0
Mar 11, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits and Work-Life Balance. Until the accounting scandal, housing crisis and the government conservatorship, Fannie Mae prided itself on its mission to provide widespread housing; its better-than-average employee benefits; its racial, religious, and sexual diversity; its philosophy that employees maintain a work-life balance through a 37.5-hour work week; and its overall treatment of employees. This is exemplified by an exceptional on-site emergency child care center and free parking, that latter of is unusual for companies operating in the DC area. Recently, the influx of former Wall Street managers has led to a diminshed pride in benefits and work-life balance, but if one gets the right department or manager, work-life balance is still possible. Analytics. Fannie Mae uses a diverse set of predictive models and analytics and often gives employees much leway in conceiving and developing them. If one is in those areas but does not want the pressures of Wall Street, Fannie Mae might provide a more interesting alternative to a commercial bank. Security. Because of the risk-averse nature of the company, managers face a lot of scrutiny when dealing with employees. This means there is some protection against being spontaneously fired by an incompetent or irrational manager, which Fannie Mae certainly has an abudance of. Of course, such protection does not preclude layoffs, or necessarily ensure that manager’s support for a promotion or his discression when informally discussing the employee with other managers at his same level.

Cons

Hiring Process. The hiring process is slow and cumbersome. Unless one can use an alternative offer as leverage, from initial contact to offer can take months. And often, interviews are conducted but forgotten shortly thereafter due to a management change or restructuring, which happens much more often than it should. Management Structure. There is a caste system that exist at Fannie Mae between managers and “individual contributers,” and the management hierarchy is enormous, culminating with an exhorbitantly-paid group of executives who are regarded equal to royalty. Because the goal of most of the management staff is to move up into the executive ranks and because the risk averse nature of the company means that promotions can easily be vetoed by just one person, a “suck-up” culture has evolved where any request from senior management no matter how ludicrous is treated as a royal decree with little pushback from middle and lower management. This means that the “individual contributors,” the ones having to deal with such requests, can sometimes find themselves overburdened as the brunt of “tall tale” directives that may have begun as a casual request but grown into major “fire drills” as they have been delegated down the chain. Management Competence. One often wonders whether the push on diversity has succeeded at the expense of competence, particularly at the Director and Vice President levels. It is completely mindboggling how some of the most complex and innovative analytical models can be rejected by managers because the results to not conform to the managers’ preconceived notions. Isn’t that the point of having models to begin with? I can personally recall having to create a spreadsheet with numerical examples for a Vice President to explain why (A*B)+(C*D) will not equal (A+C)*(B+D). Status of Tech Workers. There is less formal heirarchy at Fannie Mae with Financial and Risk at the high end and technology at the low end. Generally, technology workers are not regarded very highly because senior management does appear understand technology. Morale. Because of the government has plans of closing down Fannie Mae, there have been waves of layoffs. As a result, the morale is low and most people are looking for some type of work outside Fannie Mae, in spite of management reassurances that Fannie Mae will be around for a while. This should cause one to consider the reliability of management guidance at the company.

1.0
Nov 28, 2021

Avoid

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You do not learn anything useful here. Avoid if possible.

Cons

Both management and employees will enter your personal matters unknowingly to you (without your consent) and use that to discriminate against you. They have internal spies (employees within the company) within the company to follow you around and make reports on you like who your acquittances, contacts, friends and family members are (discriminate against you). Directors, managers and employees make their own entourages to attack you and try their best to wrongfully terminate you. Both management and team leads do not give adequate work to employees. Then, both managers and team leads complain that employees are not doing a good job. Both managers and team leads have a habit of changing their minds constantly of what they want and need done. Without your consent, managers and employees will screen your personal electronic devices (Phones, Computers etc) phone read your personal text messages, listen to your personal calls, track you using your phone, etc. whether you are at home or at work. Without your consent, managers and employees will listen to your conversations through your personal phone at home or at work. Moreover, both management and full-time employees treat their contractors very poorly. Even, after wrongful termination both employees and/or former employees will stock you to get any information on your personal matters without your knowledge. Then, both employees and former employees use it against you in any way shape and form. More importantly, both management and employees will use your personal matters against you at your new job. Managers and Human Resources Department will give you bad references when called by hiring managers and recruiters at new companies.

Viewing 25 - 27 of 2,555 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,053 Fannie Mae reviews submitted anonymously by Fannie Mae employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Fannie Mae is right for you.