employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Farmers Insurance Group

Is this your company?

Farmers Insurance Group reviews

3.2

43% would recommend to a friend

(6,864 total reviews)
avatar

Raul Vargas

41% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Farmers Insurance Group has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 6,864 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Farmers Insurance Group employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Insurance industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

7K reviews
5.0
Apr 19, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great office experience, lousy pay. The agent pays me out of his own salary so the pay is abysmal, but the environment and experience is great. I have much more knowledge about insurance and feel competant in the industry. There is no growth opportunities and i need to get another job. You get great knowledge but there is no growth you cant even become an agent. I just dont feel i am getting anything.

Cons

horrible horrible pay for my qualifications. I can not even survive on the pay. Also the agents are so incompetant. I have been working there for 6 mos and have more knowledge and abilities than the agent i work for. Its rediculous.

1.0
Apr 16, 2009

Company just keeps taking - RUN!!!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

So far they've been very stable, with no layoffs that I am aware of (other than the consolidation that has been occurring for the past 3 years or so). Most of your coworkers will share the below attitude of the company.

Cons

Over the past two years the company has done nothing but take and take. The pension plan, long an attractant for top talent, was cut off, even for those already vested. Those with 10 years or greater of tenure were 'grandfathered' in, but in looking at when they ramped up hiring, and the fact that employees vested after 5 years, it is easy to see the company was merely looking to shirk its financial responsibility in that regard. Profit sharing, the company's fully funded version of a 401(k), is also gone after this year, replaced with a 401(k) matching 100% up to 6%. Sounds good, until you realize that under profit sharing the company put an additional 15% of your base salary into the same type of account and employees contributed nothing - there was also the possibility of up to 5% bonus in cash. Vacation/sick time have been converted into 'PTO' - good for some but not others. Overall amount of time has declined drastically, but everyone got a couple of extra days they could call 'vacation' (vs sick). Health insurance is a joke - prices shot up quite a bit, and even the $1000 'seed money' for an HSA (only available under the high deductible plan) charges $3 a month in maintenance fees. Some of you may say that times are tough, so it doesn't seem so bad, but these changes were set in stone BEFORE the economy came crashing down. And the management has the gall to tell us that these lesser benefits are costing the company MORE. If that's they case, the person that made that decision needs to be canned, but under the good ole boy system that exists they won't. Speaking of the good ole boy system, the company has also proven at every turn it's not what you know but who you know when it comes to promotions. The company is definitely milking the downturn for all it's worth, underrating employees on reviews to avoid higher raises, overworking salaried employees so that they don't have to pay for more (note: salaried does not equal slavery), knowing that folks won't leave until they get something else lined up. One person in upper management even had the gall to send out an email telling employees that they should just be happy they have a job and stop complaining about the way they are being treated. Not the type of company I'd like to stay with, in my opinion.

4.0
Apr 7, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A good company native to California. In good time of course, many opportunities within different departments, claims, sales, customer service, underwriting, etc. Working as an agent is good if you don't need to make money at first, but if you know a lot of people you will start making decent money fairly quickly. For the really dedicated and successful sales agents, there is a pretty good bonus program based on sales. There are many different insurance products to offer in order to get new business and renewal commissions. Sales agents are basically self-employed and incur most expenses with some help from the company for certain things though. Once you get a good client base, one can make a lot of money from renewals alone.

Cons

Some of their processes are not very customer friendly. Not all people in the service centers know exactly what to do and have conflicting information so it can be frustrating trying to get things resolved quickly. When first starting as an agent, you only receive commissions only on sales. Unless you know a lot of people who will buy insurance from you, you won't get paid. Self-employment can be a downside also since all expenses such as advertising, office space (you can work at home though), employees once you need them, are all up to you to pay for. You can get a lot of Farmers materials for free though to get you started. Another bad thing is that they don't have as many service centers in CA anymore, they are in different states. That can be difficult since people need to be licensed in a different state of their own, different rules to follow so not everyone will be as knowledgable.

Viewing 6802 - 6804 of 6,864 Reviews

Glassdoor has 7,412 Farmers Insurance Group reviews submitted anonymously by Farmers Insurance Group employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Farmers Insurance Group is right for you.