employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Food Safety Net Services

Is this your company?

Food Safety Net Services reviews

2.3

16% would recommend to a friend

(427 total reviews)

John W. Bellinger and Amanda Bosse

25% approve of CEO

15% positive business outlook

Food Safety Net Services has an employee rating of 2.3 out of 5 stars, based on 427 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Food Safety Net Services employee rating is 34% below average for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

427 reviews
1.0
Jul 30, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good starter job to gain experience before going to work for a real company. The other lab techs are great, always need someone to share your misery. Good PTO packages when you can use them.

Cons

Long hours--cut hourly hours and work the salaried employees to death, 50+ hours is the norm. Work around the clock to customer expectations means no real set hours, just schedule on the go. No backup plans when systems fail or worker shortage, just suck it up and work longer. Getting a write-up after working a 16hr day because paperwork wasn't completed. Company promises a performance review and expectations are that a raise might follow--NOPE, your reward for a year's hard work is an Employee Christmas dinner and then another year of slave labor. Bonus's for Tech III or higher--laughable bonuses and they get smaller every year, if you get one at all. Corporate can't decide how to manage--one year a big HR department is hired for growth, the next year HR is gutted because no growth occurred. Corporate spends money on parties, but neglects the important items like benefits and employee raises. Benefits--great if you're single, spouse or family--forget it, cost is outrageous. FSNS claims to be a family friendly company--maybe they meant part of their family, I never saw mine. Corporate can't keep their good employees because they never listen! The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results--they don't get it!

1.0
Mar 11, 2014

unappreciated and unvalued

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

vacation time they offer and some of the management are encouraging.

Cons

Often understaffed but if you are hourly don't expect to get much overtime since they make the salary employees stay since they don't get paid overtime. Play favorites, and some of the higher up employees bully those they don't like. Will write up only some employees for not following company policies when many others are doing the exact same thing.

1.0
Feb 24, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were some good techs before management fired them all or drove them away.

Cons

Where to even begin? This company is awful in just about every way imaginable. Here's a short list: 1. Terrible compensation. They'll put you on salary (<$30K) to avoid paying you overtime, which they'll expect you to work as matter of course (don't forget about holidays, which you'll also have to work). They'll also make you clock in and out to make sure you're working the ~45 hours/week they expect out of you. Management will tell you they do this so they can gauge workload in the lab and determine if they need to hire extra people or not. Don't be fooled by this. They make you punch a time clock to see how dedicated you are without actually interacting with you. In other words, they want to see how many extra hours you're putting in. More hours = better employee, in their eyes. But don't try working fewer than 40 hours a week. They'll get on your case if you do that, even though you're salaried. This is their "having their cake and eating it too" philosophy. 2. Favoritism. They don't even try to hide it. Managers have their pets who can do no wrong. See #5 3. Racism. It's pretty obvious why some employees can't get ahead, and it's not due to lack of education. 4. Inappropriate behavior and comments. Lack of professionalism all around, from managers goofing off and making snide remarks about employees to whole departments laughing raucously while doing their work. If things ran smoothly and mistakes weren't constantly being made, this wouldn't be a big deal, but that clearly isn't the case. 5. Double standards. Sloppiness is tolerated out of certain employees but not others. The last person to touch a report before is goes out to the client is expected to find and correct the mistakes of all the people who touched the report before him/her. Management makes no attempt to stop the mistakes at the source. 6. Turning a blind eye. Five managers, five supervisors, who-knows how many "lead techs." Yet no attempts to improve the process of how reports and samples are generated and moved through the lab is ever attempted. The way things were done eight years ago is the way things were done last week. Nobody in management wants to look at how dysfunctional the process is because that would mean sticking one's neck out and admitting to someone in corporate that things aren't perfect in the lab. And who suffers from this cowardice? Technicians--who then have to navigate their way through a broken system. 7. Weekends. A 24/7 lab that is open every day of the year. So where's management on Saturdays and Sundays? Holidays? Nights? Oh yeah, they'll say on their way out the door, "If you need anything, give us a call." Okay, then. Why don't you stay at home and never come in, then. 8. Meetings. Endless managerial meetings. If a client calls and wants to talk to a manager, chances are he's in a meeting, which is odd because see #6. 9. Shadiness. Let's just say things aren't done by the book. The ends always justify the means. Methods are frequently modified for customer needs without subsequent analysis of how the alteration may affect the efficacy of the method. Interpretation of results are different from client to client so as to not upset them or lose their business. 10. Incompetence. a.Managers/supervisors who should understand the basic tenets of microbiology but don't acting like helicopter parents, hovering over technicians to make sure they don't make any mistakes on reports they have deemed "important," then disappearing once that report has been completed. b.Higher level techs who are afraid to speak to clients over the phone/email. c.People afraid of making mistakes pushing their responsibilities onto coworkers who shouldn't be placed in that position.

avatar
Food Safety Net Services Response
11y
Thank you for your feedback. I noticed the majority of the concerns you mention involved management. As with any organization today, we believe in the growth of our management team and we will continue to develop our staff. Other comments you mention are groundless such as ‘racism’ as FSNS is very diverse in our workforce including all levels of management. Although we thrive on our customer service and the ability to meet our customer’s needs, FSNS never sacrifices the outcome of client’s results as you deliberately suggest. With more than 8 years with FSNS, there must have been some positive aspects that kept you with our company for so long. Although your feedback appears to be emotionally driven, we thank you and continue to strive to ensure employees enjoy their tenure with us.
Viewing 37 - 39 of 427 Reviews

Glassdoor has 445 Food Safety Net Services reviews submitted anonymously by Food Safety Net Services employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Food Safety Net Services is right for you.