employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Frontgrade Technologies

Engaged Employer

Frontgrade Technologies reviews

2.6

32% would recommend to a friend

(68 total reviews)

Dr. J. Mitch Stevison

42% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Frontgrade Technologies has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 68 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Frontgrade Technologies employee rating is 28% below average for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

68 reviews
1.0
Apr 26, 2024

Good people, misguided management

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good people at the non-management level. Have made tons of friends over the years, more than most companies I've worked at. Decent benefits but would prefer a PPO health insurance option, FG only offers HSA plans which is fine for young single engineers but probably not be ideal for families or those with pre-existing conditions as you have to pay a lot out of pocket upfront (high deductible). Cafeteria is limited but serves good food, if a bit unhealthy. We manufacture some cool technologies.

Cons

Management - top-heavy, indecisive and clearly scrambling. No business plan - last all hands VP of tech said new tech roadmaps will be released by end of May 2024. Then our new CEO immediately corrected VP and said it usually takes a year to develop product road maps - they don't know what they're doing. We dramatically raised our prices last year and as a result lost out on many multi-year long bids, so money is very tight. Every day there is less and less product being manufactured, some days the production floor is nearly empty. This month (April 2024) CEO Mitch reorganized the company structure and laid off ~10-12% of our workforce, including some managers - when asked at the all hands meeting who they should report to in the new structure, CEO says they need to reach out to HR/management and figure it out themselves and says we need to stop being docile and expecting information to come to us without action on our part - in other words, assigning us a new boss isn't their responsibility but rather ours. Feels like we're winging it day by day. Former leadership started several initiatives (e.g. reorganize and consolidate file cabinets) in last 2 years that were expensive, invasive, non-essential and ultimately abandoned mid-way when the new CEO took over. Favoritism, gaslighting, disparaging remarks, blatant sexism, wearing many hats at once. We've lost several essential personnel in 2024 and months later management has not reopened their positions - money is so tight that we're just barely getting by. The remaining talent sees the writing on the wall and is leaving in droves. A few departments have lost all their engineers and are manned by techs and operators only. Favoritism and the good ol' boys network. 3 rounds of layoffs in last 6 months with more to come. Last layoff was supposed to be management-focused/top-heavy, but it seems mostly operators, techs and eng were cut. Management protects their own. Everyone knows FG is a sinking ship and lately we live in constant fear - expect retaliation if you speak out. Culture and management was much better when I was hired on years ago. Hopelessly outdated systems from the 80s hold us back. ERP system is broken. Quality/customer satisfaction/preventative maintenance is not a priority, only OTD/revenue, so we're always reactive instead of proactive. The sense of dread and despair in the air is palpable and justified.

2.0
Aug 12, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. The company valued work–life balance. The 9/80 schedule, which provided every other Friday off, was well-received. For most office roles, workloads rarely exceeded 40 hours per week. 2. The culture promoted collaboration and mutual respect. The pace in Colorado operations was steady, and the environment encouraged trust in colleagues’ decision-making and capabilities. Opportunities for leadership were available, with contribution levels largely determined by individual initiative. 3. The company offered a strong benefits package, with competitive health coverage, retirement contributions, and supported work-life balance.

Cons

1. The acquisition by a private equity firm negatively impacted the organization’s structure and commitment to continuous improvement. Previous management under CAES by Honeywell maintained clearer direction and stronger operational discipline. Leadership repeatedly failed to deliver on promised employee benefits, such as funding for certifications or career development. 2. The HR department was understaffed and overextended, resulting in inadequate performance oversight of department managers. Exit interviews, when conducted, lacked meaningful engagement. Leadership assessment could have benefited from independent evaluation. 3. Department directors often lacked the bandwidth to monitor site-level performance or translate corporate objectives into actionable site goals. Long-term planning and structured goal setting were nonexistent. The structure behind performance reviews and merit increases are a joke. 4. The company maintained relationships with problematic defense industry customers despite contract disputes, poor communication, and low returns. Leadership knew f this situation and appeared unwilling to address concerns raised by employees about these partnerships. 5. Significant layoffs in 2023 and 2024 appeared aimed at reducing operating costs to improve the company’s financial profile for resale, rather than addressing underlying operational challenges. These actions eroded morale in manufacturing operations without clear recovery plans. 6. Some managers lacked a full understanding of compliance requirements and, at times, directed teams to bypass certain process steps to meet on-time delivery targets. These decisions often resulted in avoidable quality issues that later required remediation by the Quality department.

1.0
Feb 14, 2025

Bad memories

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you like to screw off, their is little to no accountability. Laughing at the ineptitude of it all can be a kick also. There was free dark roast coffee which I liked.

Cons

Training is a total joke, as is any sense of organization. One hand does not know what the other is doing. Favoritism towards ex military is disgustingly displayed. Meetings are a complete waste of time and are demoralizing at best.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 68 Reviews

Glassdoor has 69 Frontgrade Technologies reviews submitted anonymously by Frontgrade Technologies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Frontgrade Technologies is right for you.