GIC reviews

3.0

40% would recommend to a friend

(570 total reviews)
avatar

Lim Chow Kiat

59% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

GIC has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 570 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The GIC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

570 reviews
1.0
Jan 25, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Nil. It is a good place for employees with few skill sets and see the government service as a career

Cons

Culture is not good for people coming with real world experience. There is herd mentality, a civil service culture where employees spend more time on useless paperwork that nobody reads. Group emails are a way for everyone to chime in. No real work gets done. There is too much corporate waste.

1.0
Feb 6, 2018

Manager

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overpaid, great benefits, great location

Cons

Increasingly toxic culture, lots of politicking, Wayang is encouraged, Doing real work is discouraged as low value add. People will then end up doing all wayang because who cares about real work?

1.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is still real talent here, and many colleagues remain genuinely committed to the mission of safeguarding Singapore's reserves. On a good day, you remember why you joined.

Cons

What used to feel like a purpose-driven place now feels like one where our leaders have stopped listening. The recent TG townhall introducing a senior leadership transition was, for many of us, a real letdown. During the Q&A, the top-voted questions were the ones that actually mattered to people on the ground. Issues like: 1) The growing number of negative reviews on employment platforms (like this one) 2) Perceptions of biased and network-based hiring at senior levels 3) Anxiety around career stability What we got back felt rehearsed and evasive. The kind of carefully worded non-answers that only make the concerns worse, not better. The moderator made it worse. A pointed question about whether senior hires mostly come from leaders' previous networks was brushed aside. At one point, people were basically told by her to "speak like adults," as if the concerns themselves were the problem. Mind you, these questions were submitted anonymously precisely because staff don't feel safe raising them openly. There is also strong suspicion that many submitted questions never even made it to the screen. What is most sobering is how the session is now being read on the ground: as a show. Theatre to make it look like leadership is listening, without any real intention to act. No commitment to anything concrete, like an independent review of hiring patterns, or a proper examination of the issues raised. Just nice words, and then silence..... The fact that staff have reached this level of cynicism, where most people now assume it's all for show rather than sincere, is itself the most damning part. Trust that has eroded this much doesn't come back from one well-rehearsed speech. From conversations across teams, the overwhelming majority of staff feel some version of this. This is not a communications problem. It is a leadership problem.

Viewing 88 - 90 of 570 Reviews

Glassdoor has 842 GIC reviews submitted anonymously by GIC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GIC is right for you.