GIC reviews

3.0

39% would recommend to a friend

(572 total reviews)
avatar

Lim Chow Kiat

58% approve of CEO

28% positive business outlook

GIC has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 572 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The GIC employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Financial Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

572 reviews
1.0
Sep 29, 2016

disorganized IT

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

colleague with common topic to discuss in work

Cons

Many and endless... disorganized IT and nobody willing to take up responsibility and push around esp ITG team. What a joke.

1.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mediocrity pays well. Ironically mediocrity pays as you’re not a threat and this ensures your survivability in the firm as well as if you’re a scholar. Lookup the President of the Singapore Porsche Club for the past few years . You wonder where the time and dedication goes in looking after the reserves. If you have the right management support then life is good. Very very good.

Cons

Purposefully and dutifully managing the assets don’t seem to be on anyone’s priority list. Just politicking and surviving the backstabbing is the name of the game here. You’re lucky if you get to go through a PIP plan by HR. Most just get asked to leave on the spot. Don’t come as a mid career hire . No mercy at all. Their so called PRIME values - Prudence, Respect, Integrity, Meritocracy, Excellence - is truly laughable and they can say it with a straight face when it’s the complete opposite of their values.

1.0
Jul 14, 2026

Strong mission but struggling leadership and complexity issues

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The purpose of the organisation remains its strongest selling point. It is difficult to find many employers where your work genuinely contributes to something larger than quarterly earnings, and that sense of mission is what keeps many experienced employees around. The organisation also deserves credit for investing in AI capability. Covering subscriptions and giving staff access to modern AI tools demonstrates a willingness to develop its people. In an environment where many firms are still debating whether to embrace AI, this is one area where the company is ahead of the curve.

Cons

The organisation’s performance has been on a downward trajectory for several years, yet there appears to be limited visible accountability at the GEC level. Changes have certainly been made, but much of the GEC remains intact. In many private-sector organisations, prolonged underperformance would likely prompt more significant leadership renewal. Here, that seems less apparent. The appointment of a new Group CIO also left many employees with unanswered questions; Was the individual picked because he delivered the best returns? Succession and leadership appointments benefit from transparency, yet there was little communication around the rationale or selection criteria. Better communication would have strengthened confidence in the process. The Technology Group has been through repeated reorganisations while simultaneously expanding its senior leadership ranks. It is fair to ask whether it requires this many additional senior management roles when the overall mandate has not fundamentally changed. From an employee’s perspective, restructuring has often felt like creating more reporting lines rather than simplifying delivery. Equally disappointing has been the role played by Technology HR. Rather than acting as a credible strategic partner that provides balanced challenge and independent advice, the function is often perceived by employees as simply facilitating management decisions. In a period of repeated restructuring, many expected HR to provide stronger stewardship of organisational health, workforce planning and employee trust. That opportunity appears to have been missed. Corporate planning has also fallen short in practical ways. Headcount growth was hardly unexpected, yet the outcome has been teams split across separate office buildings, with employees spending unnecessary time walking between locations for meetings. It is an avoidable inefficiency that affects productivity, collaboration and morale. Basic operational planning should not become a daily inconvenience for staff. Overall, there is an increasing sense that organisational complexity is growing faster than organisational effectiveness. Decisions often appear to add more management, more processes and more layers, rather than solving the underlying issues.

Viewing 142 - 144 of 572 Reviews

Glassdoor has 844 GIC reviews submitted anonymously by GIC employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GIC is right for you.