GSK reviews

3.8

71% would recommend to a friend

(7,040 total reviews)
avatar

Luke Miels

82% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

GSK has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 7,040 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The GSK employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

7K reviews
3.0
Jan 9, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work life balance and very good pay. The majority of management is open to ideas and offers advice when needed.

Cons

GSK is moving a majority of their IT staff out of US. More layoffs starting soon. New employee stack ranking system designed to give smaller bonuses and force competition between employees. This is the exact rating system that Microsoft just abolished, the so-called, Rank-and-Yank. I would say it was to weed out the bottom 10% of employees, if they hadn't already laid so many people off. I believe it is to help relieve the company of more US/UK employees so GSK does not have to give them a severance package as they continue to eliminate jobs in US/UK and hire in other countries.

3.0
Jan 8, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+Excellent pay and benefits +Flexible work hours (though varies based on job and boss) +Stimulating projects (nothing is ever routine) +Good budgets for great equipment (up until 10 years ago)

Cons

-RTP site being shutdown -For 25+ years before shutdown, had endless counterproductive reorganizations that crushed productivity and caused confusion -For 25+ years before shutdown, had endless management 'initiatives' that never achieved anything and were usually abandoned before getting to the implementation phase -For 10+ years before shutdown, had layoffs about every 1.5 years with most experienced/best scientists getting cut -For 10+ years before shutdown had minimal chances for meaningful promotions -Complete disconnect between 'talking about quality' and actual timelines & resources allocated for developing projects -Most equipment not upgraded or replaced in over 10 years -Now outsourcing EVERYTHING with resulting increased management burden and decreased quality -Moving R&D to China has been major fiasco

3.0
Jan 7, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay. Excellent benefits. Great to work in lab if you get the chance. Many good coworkers to collaborate with. EXCELLENT associates-very talented and independent. Working with them is more of a collaboration than a supervisor-supervisee relationship. In fact, they are more fun and worthwhile to interact with than most peers.

Cons

Management is completely untrained, both with respect to running a research program and with respect to working with others. People are promoted into management positions based on ambition rather than ability. The more of a steamroller you are the better. There is no training available to scientists with respect to managing and interacting with people (and we are scientists-'nuf said), and to rely on management that also has no people skills is a mistake. I was having trouble with a report once and my "pep talk" meeting with her was absolutely disastrous. I handled it very poorly, and could have used a little coaching. Additionally, managers are completely unable to run meetings, allowing some people to turn a 5 minute update into a 30 minute dissertation. That turns a 1 hour meeting into a 2 1/2 hour waste of an afternoon. I also wonder if there isn't a little seniority discrimination or "problem dumping" going on. During one of our department downsizings, I was chosen to be one of people who needed to find another position within the company. I was having some serious personal problems at the time, and was also one of the highest paid non-managers. In the nine years I had spent in that department, I had received mostly excellent reviews and several awards (including a very rarely given gold award). Admittedly I was struggling at the time I was selected to go elsewhere, but rather than try to help me and guide me through my troubles, the director chose to dump me instead. So honestly I can only suspect that the dumping came from wanting to make me someone else's problem or to get rid of one of the highest paid scientists.

Viewing 6532 - 6534 of 7,040 Reviews

Glassdoor has 15,928 GSK reviews submitted anonymously by GSK employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if GSK is right for you.