employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Assembly

Is this your company?

General Assembly reviews

3.5

34% would recommend to a friend

(77 total reviews)

Daniele Grassi

43% approve of CEO

25% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

77 reviews

Reviews about "Compensation"

Return to all reviews
1.0
Feb 19, 2020

Don't work here

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you have the right connections or are politically savvy, you can climb the ranks. Students and instructors are great and for what it's worth, you're positively impacting people's lives through your work.

Cons

Many smart people have left honest and accurate reviews before me. My experience at GA was more or less the same. If you can avoid it, save yourself the heartache and do not take a job at GA. - HR is dysfunctional. HR departments in general exists to protect companies, I am realistic about my expectations. This team in particular works to uphold the unfair and discriminatory practices that make up the company’s DNA. They’re aware of company wide pay gaps and the barriers that exist for advancement for some groups and they do nothing to solve them. If you talk to them about your concerns, they’ll either act surprised (Oscar-worthy performances!) or explain it away. If you want to be actively gaslit or given baseless explanations for why you’re being discriminated against or underpaid - schedule a meeting with HR. Otherwise, save your time and look for another job outside the company instead. - Diversity and inclusion efforts are a joke. GA does the bare minimum to continuously recruit diverse candidates at the entry level to middle management layers of the organization - rarely does GA hire candidates at the leadership level that are POC. These team members are brought on board, quickly spot glaring diversity issues, are tapped to join "task forces" and "committees" to help "solve" longstanding structural issues, are given no budget or resources to fund those committee's initiatives, and are forced to leave when they realize it was all a farce. GA has figured out the biggest scam of all time - you never have to commit to actually solving your diversity issues if you never retain diverse talent. - Poor leadership at the highest levels of the company. I’ll echo everyone below and confirm that most people in the company dislike the company CEO. There’s a general mistrust of the executive team and rightfully so, the majority of them are simply not qualified to be decision makers for a multimillion dollar enterprise. See below. - Financial performance is scary. GA rarely hits their revenue targets. Execs set annual goals sky high despite pushback from their teams and every year the panic sets in between March-July, when they realize they’re not only in jeopardy of missing their goals but would need the help of a supernatural power in order to come close. I still have no idea how they’ve managed to keep the lights on, but be prepared to suffer whiplash from all of the extra work you'll be tasked with when the company is scrambling to soften the blow of a major revenue miss.

5.0
Jul 11, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I've really enjoyed working in the engineering/product department. The culture in this department has been a good experience for me, and the leadership in this group has been really supportive in tackling issues impacting day to day life, and in taking on major issues like diversity. The company is transitioning from growth phase to maturity, so there's a lot of development work to do that involves fixing scrappy code that was written in a hurry a few years ago. That's not a diss at the people who wrote it; that's a product of how old this company is, so don't expect this to be like working at a huge, long established company. That said, the company has been around long enough to have fleshed out agile practices, good version control practices, lots of documentation--the sorts of things that start ups tend not to have at all, so I like that it's a solid in-between environment. The engineering and product team is pretty spread out geographically, so everyone comes to NYC twice a year for "Festivus," which involves a hackathon, speakers, lots of food, lots of social events, etc. It was a really fun time. The remote culture in engineering is really strong; because so much of the team is remote, everyone is really good about doing video calls, bantering on slack (the #cats channel is great), and keeping up communication (even informal stuff) without having everyone in the office. I really can't speak to what culture is like in other departments; as a remote employee, I don't really see how that culture plays out in other areas. Growth opportunities in engineering are good; engineering teams all have clear growth charts (one management track, one principal engineer track), so you can see your next few possible promotions and the rubrics for them ahead of time. I've seen lots of promotions since I've been here (in this department), so it's actually happening. Beyond all of that, the perks are good. Unlimited PTO is really great, and at least in my part of the engineering department, getting approved is no problem. Healthcare benefits are great--I was on a high deductible plan before I came here, and I'm actually paying less now for a really good PPO plan. No 401k match, but the 401k plan options are still pretty good. Dental, vision, short and long term disability, FSA for childcare and transit are all also available.

Cons

Some sort of stipend for home office/coworking costs for remote employees would be really nice (the pay raise I took when I started was more than enough to make it worthwhile, but remote work isn't entirely free). It does seem like our CEO is a bit of a butt head, but that doesn't have really any impact on my day to day in the job, and there are other members of the exec group I really respect. Priorities do seem to shift a bit quarter to quarter, but it seems like the product group is doing some work to stabilize that on a day to day basis for engineers. No 401k match.

2.0
Jun 25, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Met some great, creative, hard-working people near the start of my tenure - Dog friendly - End of list

Cons

Every smart employee I know at GA is actively looking for a way out. The way this place is run is truly a joke: - Lifers who have been around from the start are rewarded even when their performance/contribution are near non-existent. Highly suspect some are still on payroll despite not playing a part in everyday operations whatsoever. - Senior management is one big echo chamber that doesn't listen to the concerns of those they manage (AKA the ones doing the hard work). - "HR" doesn't listen to employee concerns no matter how many times they hear the same complaint. GA's HR policy is "don't fix it if it doesn't get in the way of profit" — review cycles are sort of bogus and don't tie directly to promotions/raises. - In the quest to make money no matter what, GA does business with orgs/countries that have questionable morals. - No one respects the CEO; the CEO doesn't respect his employees. - During my time, seemed as though every month was another perk cut.

Viewing 43 - 45 of 77 Reviews

Glassdoor has 904 General Assembly reviews submitted anonymously by General Assembly employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if General Assembly is right for you.