Health Catalyst reviews

3.3

44% would recommend to a friend

(782 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Albert

28% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

Health Catalyst has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 782 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Health Catalyst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

782 reviews
2.0
Aug 4, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay and benefits, pays for gym membership (has onsite gym in SLC too). Some projects are interesting. Plenty of opportunity to dig in and contribute if you look around. These opportunities are increasing across the company for the most part. You can develop your skills in these projects.

Cons

True, reorgs can be disruptive. Those that remain working with senior management the longest (either direct or indirect) seem to have the best experience. This also often leads to people not using their skills best and to frustration with their roles. Some important decisions are made with missing information that could have been sought. Some products are invested in and pushed without being tested enough first, too. We say we're transparent, but, it really depends on who you work with and your relationship with senior leaders. Managers need to learn to have "fierce conversations" with their employees with enough frequency, and they also need to learn how to be effective managers (or they shouldn't manage). Leadership needs to discern much better on that front --- choosing which people should manage people. True, the Peter Principle is rampant, probably because leadership doesn’t know any better. Right now, we seem to select managers based on their sales, communication, and presentation skills, or on their high technical aptitude. Are those the best criteria? Maybe. Or maybe not.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7y
Thank you for sharing this feedback. I agree that we need to have a measurement infrastructure in place to assess the effectiveness of every manager at Health Catalyst, and we will have that infrastructure in place by the end of this year (2018), as we roll out the 360-degree feedback process. I regret that it's taken us this long to roll this out. That will enable us to spot and then address issues where the team member experience with their manager is sub-optimal. I invite you to share your feedback through this process, and I hope that as we work hard to address issues in the coming months, that you'll see improvement in your team member experience. Thanks again for sharing this feedback. Best, Dan
2.0
Jul 24, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits. Executive leadership try to be good people. Great place to be if you are just starting your career, are friend/family of executive leadership, or have a resume they can leverage for credibility.

Cons

Double/triple standards all over the place. You are told to manage your career but are just supposed to figure out how — but if you don’t fit one of the valued categories (friend, family, industry resume) don’t bother trying. They constantly shift organization structure but don’t ever acknowledge that they are shifting because they made a mistake and are having to correct for it. And they never acknowledge that some of the mistakes are due to leadership simply not being good at their jobs. Much of the leadership just below the executives are the “friends and family” variety and this is their first management experience— and Health Catalyst is okay with letting them learn on the backs of everyone else. Some leadership is just awful and gets very defensive about it.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7y
I have read, pondered and reread your feedback multiple times, and as I have considered your words, over the past few weeks, I can see some important (if difficult) work we need to do to become better as leaders and as a company. First, I want to acknowledge that I have made mistakes, and we have made mistakes as a leadership team. I know that this is true. This includes elements of prior organizational changes -- and I apologize to you and I regret every instance in which it becomes clear to me that I and/or we have made a mistake or have handled a situation in a sub-optimal way. It is disheartening to me to hear of experiences where you feel that leaders at Health Catalyst have been defensive about acknowledging when they may have made a mistake or fallen short. That runs directly counter to our cultural attribute of humility. And humility becomes increasingly central in its importance as a team member takes on greater leadership responsibilities. I can see that we have more work to do here. As we roll out the Manager/Leader 360-degree feedback surveys during the second half of this year, we will be asking specific questions regarding humility, openness to feedback, avoidance of defensiveness, and for the first time, we will have a more precise sense of how each manager and leader in the company is performing, at every level, along these dimensions. This brings me to the next item of feedback that you shared, around why people are chosen for leadership assignments (based on family relationships or friendships vs. based on performance and qualification) and, related to this, whether anyone at Health Catalyst is untouchable. First, I want to acknowledge that this feedback has been shared by multiple team members, both in Glassdoor reviews and in the Gallup surveys, as well as through the anonymous feedback channel we have on the intranet site. This suggests to me that we need to pay attention to this feedback, and better understand how to fix any situations where we may have not lived up to the company's values. We also need to be thoughtful about how we gain visibility to where those situations may exist so that we can then address the issues. This has been one of the reasons driving our development of 360-degree feedback surveys for every manager, at every level of the company, no exceptions. I will be the first to receive this feedback, then every member of the leadership team, then the ELT members, and ultimately every manager at Health Catalyst will receive this feedback and participate in this process, before the end of 2018. I will have direct access to all of this feedback, and am committed to carefully reviewing this feedback, at every level, including first for myself (and all the feedback on my performance will be shared with the chairman of the board). No one at Health Catalyst should be untouchable. Each leader should be in a role based on their performance and qualification, not based on any non-market-based factor, including family relationships, friendship relationships or any other non-market-based factor. As we collect this feedback and as it enables us to identify areas for improvement, we will work to address these areas, including, hopefully in most cases, an opportunity to coach and train and enable managers and leaders to improve, but in cases where improvement is not achieved and/or where there is not an openness to the need to change, we will make changes. I also want to share our commitment to go through an interview process for every leadership position at Health Catalyst, as the default approach -- and any exceptions to this process need to be approved by the leadership team. This process will include us posting the position, inviting candidates to apply, having an interview team comprised of more than the hiring manager, before leadership positions are filled. The feedback you shared is hard to receive, at a few levels. But I'm grateful for it. I see significant value in feedback channels that are unfiltered, like Glassdoor, like Gallup and like the anonymous feedback mechanisms on our company's intranet. I may not agree with the feedback in every instance, but often as I work to exercise humility and resist the human tendency towards defensiveness, there are important nuggets of truth that need to be paid attention to, if we are to live up to our mission and our values. I can see these nuggets of truth in your feedback, and for that I am grateful. We will go to work to try to improve in these critical areas. Best, Dan
5.0
Jul 8, 2018

As mission- and team-member-oriented as a company gets

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Individuals aim to keep the mission and team members in mind when making decisions. Innovation in Health Catalyst technology and professional services organizations is critical to enable customers to make better, data-driven decisions. Health Catalyst could truly help improve the healthcare ecosystem

Cons

Still a lot of maturing to do across the company (products, services, operations) as the company scales (but it is fun to be a part of a scaling company!). Need to focus on measuring the performance of team members so that high-performing team members get rewarded and low-performing team members don’t simply get shuffled around to different positions – keeping low-performing team members demoralizes those that work hard and are high performers, especially when everyone is on the same bonus structure

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7y
Thank you for your encouraging words and for your constructive feedback as well. Thank you also for contributing to the company's mission for over three years. Your longer-term commitment to the company makes a difference. I share your vision that Health Catalyst can play an important role in enabling meaningful transformation in healthcare, both through our technology and our services. I also agree with your assessment that we have a lot of maturing to do across the company. We are trying to become more "courageously transparent" in dealing with performance issues (this is one reason we as a leadership team are considering adding "courageous" as a modifier to the operating principle of transparency, to emphasize that transparency is most critical in challenging situations, including when there is a performance issue that needs to be addressed, and often requires courage). We also continue to try to think carefully about benefitting from the team-based mindset and bonus infrastructure, while also having ways to recognize extraordinary individual performance. Recognizing extraordinary individual performance has largely come through the promotion process and through off-cycle compensation adjustments. But there is likely more we can do there. I'll visit with Linda (our Chief People Officer) on this topic, and see what we can learn from other companies in this regard. Thank you for your feedback and for your contributions to the company's mission. Best, Dan
Viewing 613 - 615 of 782 Reviews

Glassdoor has 845 Health Catalyst reviews submitted anonymously by Health Catalyst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Health Catalyst is right for you.