Health Catalyst reviews

3.4

45% would recommend to a friend

(780 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Albert

Not enough data to show CEO approval

24% positive business outlook

Health Catalyst has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 780 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Health Catalyst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

780 reviews
3.0
Feb 22, 2021

Lost It's Way

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has done it's best through the covid world. Yes, some benefits got cut but for the most part business went on. The mission, if acted on, has potential.

Cons

I have struggled to put my finger on what has bothered me as time as gone on. I have been here a while and have seen many changes and honestly the direction is very, very discouraging and disappointing. The culture is gone, plain and simple. This is just another run of the mill company. The company cares about billable hours and not actual outcomes. That's secondary, billable hours is the priority. This means wild west on solutions being re invented over and over. You have so many leads assigned to a client, TD, AD, CSL, SAE, and whatever other billable acronym you can think of. And they all want to be in charge. It’s a gigantic mess. So much fighting for hours and credit with no focus on the outcomes. Praise and promotions are given to those with the loudest voice, not those with the skills or ability. Just the loudest voice and boy, are there some loud voices, and they get promotions. They are destroying high functioning teams by trying to move to a shared, consolidated resource system or even talent pools. This is to save the teams that are failing while causing a disruption to those teams that are functioning. Trying to consolidate and resource pool talent is never a good idea, loss of productivity, ownership, focus and specialization as well as morale. For very little to no return. Product managers are also being subjected to the same structure, and there is also this notion that a product manager should not be a subject matter expert in the area their product. I liken that to a Ford project being led by someone who has never been in a car. To me, it makes no sense, but this is how it is. They are hiring new positions with the purpose of overseeing and micromanaging other positions on other teams, such as product managers. It’s micromanagement at its finest. In addition to the job promotions, hiring for high level positions is very shady. They post a job with qualifications that appear to be copied from the resume of the person they have already planned to hire. Recent reviews have surfaced similar concerns and the reply has been "feel free to look elsewhere" I think my road at Catalyst has come to an end. Which is sad, I am deeply committed to the team I am on. But they consistently throw more and more morale killing red tape. This company is not running lean. Almost everyone has two bosses, this goes along with that whole shared resource thing. It doesn't work.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for your transparent feedback, which is informed across many years at Health Catalyst. I'm very sorry to internalize the frustration and discouragement that you feel as a result of challenges in the professional services organization, including matrix-structures, inefficiency and micro-management. I acknowledge that we're definitely experiencing growing pains in these areas, and we've had a few deep-dives to try to better understand this, which has helped. I wonder if you'd be willing to visit with me and/or Linda Llewelyn, our Chief People Officer, 1:1 to help us better understand your experience, including the micro-management, the organizational challenges, and particularly the sense that the loudest voices are those that are listened to the most. I also want to understand and address any situations where we're not living up to the operating principle of respect. We would commit to keep the feedback you share confidential. I apologize for the difficulties you're experiencing, and will work to try to enable improvement here as we also strive to grow and become financially sustainable. We are going to update our measures for success for the professional services organization as part of 2021 planning, and enable an evolution which I believe will be positive and helpful. But it will also take some time, and still of necessity operate within certain business model and financial constraints. Thank you again for sharing this feedback. Best, Dan
2.0
Mar 19, 2018

The only thing you control is your attitude

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Awesome benefits. I love the transparency the top level of leaders demonstrate. They are great examples of the Catalyst Way. The people here are friendly, cooperative, and easy to work with. They have a lot of good things going for them that can keep people satisfied despite cons they may experience.

Cons

The reorg made sense during All Team Member meetings, but wasn't implemented correctly maybe. Some people got moved to positions they wanted but aren't qualified for, and other people got moved to positions they didn't want and aren't qualified for. Those cases in particular were never explained and led to frustration. Even if you asked for reasoning from a manager in some cases, there was a lot of sidestepping around the core issue (likely because they didn't know themselves). And if you ask too much, people start to think you have a bad attitude when all you want is clarification. Your career path became totally outside of your control and in the control of your managers who may or may not have known you or your skill sets that well. And it seems like no movement will take place for another year or so, so you just have to deal with it until then. It seems education isn't taken into account except for initially getting hired. Along with the previous point, it didn't make sense why people were moved or not moved. Background didn't seem to be the determining factor at least. Now with the salary levels, I know recent hires with the same background but different levels of degrees, but both have the same amount of work experience (minimal), so they are placed in the same salary level. And because of the reorg, the person with the graduate degree actually has a lower salary range due to their new job title. And all these things were outside of their control, with no explanation of why this happened.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
8y
Thank you for this review and for sharing this feedback. I see confirming patterns in other team member feedback, particularly the qualitative comments in the most recent Gallup survey. I concur with your hypotheses that the imperfect reorganization we implemented in July of 2017 put many team members in unfamiliar roles that a good number had not independently pursued or requested, and that this would very likely impact answers to the two Gallup questions you reference above. As we've discussed in ATM meetings and Q&A sessions, the first part of 2017 was very challenging for the company. The 3-month pause in our sales pipeline (the "Trump Pause") significantly impacted our ability to execute against the Operating Plan we had developed, and instead required us to make mid-year adjustments that had a ripple impact on many team members. I'm grateful we preserved team members' positions at the company, even during that rough patch, but we did need to reorganize and to respond to market demands for our products and services, some of which we didn't fully anticipate. I strongly hope that as the company continues its significant growth acceleration since Q1 of 2017 (including our record-breaking Q1 2018 that just closed!!), this growth will enable more flexibility for team members to move to positions that better align with their experience, their skillets and their interests. I also hope that the significant project we are completing around consistent job leveling across every job family and every function will enable hundreds of productive career-development discussions between team members and their managers, and provide a structure and framework for these discussions to be concrete and more clear in terms of understanding a 5-year career trajectory, with a better definition around educational and experiential requirements to qualify for promotion to the next job level. This will take a little time to really become a productive framework for each team member, but we are already seeing some encouraging signs that more career discussions are occurring than perhaps ever before in the company's history. I appreciate your patience and your willingness to work your way through some bumps in the road as we grow and develop and mature as a company. I acknowledge the validity of your feedback, and appreciate you sharing it, and would want to convey our sincere desire and effort to improve in the areas you've highlighted. Thank you again for your contributions to the company's mission. Best, Dan
2.0
Jan 31, 2018

Still don't understand the hype

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good location, product felt important and had admirable goals, decent pay

Cons

Weird vibe - co-workers seemed to think it was the best place ever but key teams were highly dysfunctional. Quiet environment. Boring. No experimentation -- just do what had already been proven to work, sort of. Felt like you were getting nowhere most of the time but maybe that was because I had a boss who wouldn't let his team do their jobs (he liked to do everything for them because obviously his team was incompetent). Work/life balance was awful on certain teams - very dependent upon manager. Unsure how they continue to get awards for "best places to work" -- other employers must be even more awful in Utah.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
8y
Thanks for sharing your perspective, and I'm sorry to hear that your experience while at Health Catalyst included elements that are not consistent with who we strive to be. We continue to work on manager & leader training and development, and we're also striving to be more active and consistent in addressing performance management issues. But we still have room for improvement, as your experience highlights. In terms of encouraging new voices to speak up, that is certainly something we as a leadership team are committed to doing. We continue to utilize Gallup every six months to survey every team member, anonymously, on their experience, both in terms of quantitative answers to their standard 13 questions tied to their calculation of employee engagement, and qualitative feedback in free-form responses to open-ended questions. I read every response to every survey, multiple times. We discuss the quantitative and qualitative responses for multiple hours as a leadership team, and have enacted dozens of policy changes as a result of this feedback over the years. We also share the full quantitative results with every team member, every six months, and review together in our All-Team-Member (ATM) meetings -- we will be reviewing the most recent results in this Friday's ATM meeting. Likewise, we read, review and respond to every Glassdoor post, and we highlight this content transparently at every ATM meeting. In addition, recently (and this may have occurred since you left the company) we have supported the creation of various affinity groups to provide an opportunity for additional discussion and consideration of how we can continuously improve. Within the last few weeks I have had the opportunity to attend a few of these affinity group meetings, including the Women's Group and the LGBTQ Group discussions. I want to acknowledge that through these various mechanisms to encourage and listen to feedback, it has been confirmed to me that we continue to have room for improvement as a company. At the same time, we are grateful to see many examples of positives at the company, including industry-leading employee engagement scores, and industry-leading customer satisfaction scores (including today's announcement that Health Catalyst was recognized as Best in KLAS for Healthcare Analytics for the second year in a row). Still, there is plenty of opportunity to improve. I feel that my first responsibility as the CEO is to represent and advocate for our team members. If we as a leadership team can create an environment in which highly talented team members choose to come to Health Catalyst and to stay at Health Catalyst, and that they are highly engaged in the mission of the company, then these team members will serve our customers at the highest possible level. These customers will realize significant value as a result, and will choose to renew and expand their relationships with us, which will lead to growth, expansion and financial strength, producing a strong return for our investors. I feel regret that we did not fully realize this team member objective in your case, and for that I apologize. Please know that we're focused on improving, and I appreciate your feedback and wish you success in your current and future endeavors.
Viewing 7 - 9 of 780 Reviews

Glassdoor has 843 Health Catalyst reviews submitted anonymously by Health Catalyst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Health Catalyst is right for you.