IBM reviews

3.9

78% would recommend to a friend

(107,137 total reviews)
avatar

Arvind Krishna

76% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

IBM has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 107,137 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IBM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

107K reviews
1.0
Sep 10, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Educational Resources (maybe) I am finally out!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cons

- Below the minimum industry compensation - Weak benefits - Long hours - 100% travel (Contract specifies only 50%) - Terrible management (care only about numbers and will tell you whatever you want to hear) Never share anything and never trust them. I've seen people get burned because they were naive and trustworthy - Baton Rouge, LA (No offence to this city, but NO thank you, never again. This city is the kingdom of boredom and depression) I bet if the center was located in New Orleans it would have been less depressing. - Almost no chance to transfer (Beware, the unspoken policy to transfer is that you have to spend at least 2 years in CIC. Never specified in your contract. So was caught totally by surprise) - No career path. You will be hired as a developer and will perform analyst work instead or/and vice versa. The list of Cons can go on even further, but I just wanted to highlight the major issues with this specific location.

1.0
Jul 14, 2015

Visual Designer

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There were little to no pros when working for IBM Design. The biggest pro was that I got to work from home, and that got very old very fast.

Cons

- Isolated team environment, everyone I worked with was remote. - IBM Design has little practice in creating a working formula for designers to succeed in a completely developer driven culture. - Management is a confused bunch of people that have a very hard time helping their team succeed. - IBM Design studio in Austin, TX is way overcrowded. I am sure that they are not meeting fire code standards. - Almost all products that you could work on are completely lame. Recruitment lies to your face throughout the process telling you that when being deployed onto a project they take what you would like to work on into consideration. - 3 month Design Camp is like a shortened college class that you get paid for. This was extremely boring and monotonous. - Most importantly : as a designer at IBM Design you have very little say on the projects you are creating. Everyone in the studio puts on a daily happy face as they are all hating the projects they work on and trying to do anything to switch products. This makes the workplace a horrid environment to be in daily, with very little work actually getting done.

1.0
Feb 13, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the few industry research labs where you can keep one foot in the academic world. Flexible work environment and schedule.

Cons

IBM Corporate has no clue how to truly get long term value from research. As others have posted, research is high-risk high-reward, but in the past years IBM is only concerned with quarterly bottom lines. IBM Researchers are constantly bombarded with inappropriate projects just to help immediate revenue. Over the years IBM Research has seen a lot of turn over as many researchers leave for academic or industry positions due to the degradation of the value of true research. As such, management at IBM Research is slowly being filled with more 'corporate' minded employees. IBM Corporate simultaneously wants to tap IBM Research for immediate boosts to revenue and also expects game-changing products. They fail to see that the former will impact the latter, and as others have posted, do not understand that Research needs to be insulated to make long term dramatic impact. Morale at IBM Research is at a near all time low. IBM Research does not value their researchers and the message you infer is that you should simply be grateful for the opportunity to work at IBM research. Compensation, benefits, and perks are constantly being reduced and eroded. The building itself is abysmal. Bleak, no windows in offices, dirty, musty, ancient office equipment (unless you are IBM Corporate, they have all the nice offices and meeting rooms). For a tech company that is attracting top researchers and tech people it is truly sad that one has to beg and plead for the most basic needs (monitor for laptop, mouse, stapler, ...). The current problems at IBM Research mostly impact the new Research Staff members and Postdoctoral Researchers. Old employees have learned to insulate themselves better from IBM Corporate, but new employees are at their mercy. From experience I know researchers at IBM used to have 25%-50% of their time free for their own research. Going in to my job I expected this, but this delusion was quickly shattered. New researchers are expected to work on IBM dictated projects or research directions. I was made to feel guilty for working on personal research (which was still oriented along our general research lines). Again, the impression you get is they can always higher new top talent because of their reputation. So, accept it or leave. But the prestige of working at IBM Research is falling rapidly. For those looking for a dynamic and agile work place, IBM Research is just the opposite. Mostly this is simply due to the sheer size of IBM. But the remaining fault lies with the culture at IBM. It is slow and stale, and the often infuriating part is many IBMers think the opposite. Compounding this, IBM Research (and IBM Corporate) as a demographic is older. Not that this is a problem, but one should be aware if they are young, energetic, and bright-eyed, this is not the place for you. Lastly, the software, tools, and support one is forced to use at IBM (looking at you Lotus Notes) is atrocious and often wastes an inordinate amount of time to do things that should be simple and straightforward. IBM Research is on the decline. They are coasting on their (deserved) reputation as a leading industry research lab. Those days are gone. Morale is low, people are leaving, the wrong people are staying, and sadly management actually does know about the problem yet seems unwilling or incapable of fixing the it. IBM Research is moving to a place where they do not value their employees yet expect them to be grateful to simply work for IBM. Pockets of true old-school IBM Research groups still exist, mainly in the math group, but those are being squeezed out. That is why you still see (and rightly so) positive reviews of IBM Research. But as a whole, IBM Research is spiraling down the drain. Sadly, I believe in 10-15 years it will be a shell of what it used to be. They are losing their real talent and what made them special, and can only ride on their reputation for so long. Most likely the remaining talent will be divided into the profitable non-research divisions and it will be no more.

Viewing 49 - 51 of 107,137 Reviews

Glassdoor has 131,525 IBM reviews submitted anonymously by IBM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IBM is right for you.