ICF reviews

3.7

69% would recommend to a friend

(2,740 total reviews)
avatar

John Wasson

82% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

ICF has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 2,740 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The ICF employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Jul 14, 2014

Run away if you are offered an on-site opportunity at a government client.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None. This is just a horrible employer where a large part of their business is augmenting the staff of the government with positions nobody wants for long.

Cons

ICF government services business model means they are powerless to improve your client-site situation (even if it's a simple matter of office work-space). All they try to get you to do is believe the lies they push on the client as well as work both ends against the middle. It's a real downward spiral for ICF because they can rarely keep higher-educated people at the government client sites. If you are in government, in some cases all you need is time on the job and a heartbeat to take on management responsibilities (and they love to throw their weight around with contractors). ICF is right behind them. The benefit to you is that you get TWO boneheads to work for! If you like both a day-to-day client bonehead to work for as well as a useless ICF "manager," then this is the place for you.

2.0
Nov 20, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some specific contract work can be interesting. It really all depends on what contracts are won and where in the contract cycle you are at. For the first couple years (the honeymoon period), the work environment is exciting and motivational. The staff (NOT THE MANAGEMENT) that work at ICF International are a diverse and wonderful bunch. The Holiday Party they put on in DC is baller. Some benefits are good. Managers tend to have lots of industry credentials.

Cons

Starting salary is below par and not competitive. Annual raises are a joke. Only get 18 days of vacation AND sick leave. Parents watch out. There is no sense that ICF really cares whether you stay or not. ICF International does not invest in you...the client does. Managers have an expectation for staff to occasionally work long hours and weekends in light of the low pay (there's no overtime pay). Managers have NO CLUE what it's like for the staff because none of them worked at ICF as staff. Staff come and go (i.e., turnover is high) and managers are hired from industry. The company is VERY siloed meaning group managers are very possessive of staff and don't care if you think another group's work is more interesting even if you have little billable work within your own group. The entry level title is (RESEARCH ASSISTANT) and is demeaning and not appropriate.

3.0
Jan 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to work on many different projects across clients, disciplines, and tasks, which if you are starting in or transitioning into your industry of interest, it gives you many talking points/experience for the next job. Most people are friendly, human, and care about the work. Salary can be OK depending on your circumstance compared to competitors/non-profits. Full-time remote work is a big perk (at the time, ~65% of the company was remote). They are forward thinking, strive to be innovative, and have a good/proven reputation of expertise in climate/sustainability.

Cons

Most staff across levels are severely overworked and underpaid for what they contribute, especially for levels 1-3. They have a "figure it out" culture where they rely greatly on younger staff to step up, and provide very little help on tasks, especially if you are not entry-level. Sometimes, people can step up, but it's not very forgiving even tho it's said you're allowed to fail and learn from it. The disorganization and lack of coordination across teams was something I had never experienced before. I witnessed someone get placed on a project where their role was to fulfill the responsibilities of 2 staff members who had left the year before, and the manager, who was the only/main institutional knowledge of the project, went on long-term leave just after they started without appropriately backfilling the team to respond to client demands. Many projects have a 48h or less turn-around expectation either due to client or management's expectations, most of which probably did not actually have to be turned that quickly with a more inclusive conversation and patient project management structure. There was a lot of manufactured urgency and deference to the client instead of protecting employees, which led to a detriment in work/life balance and culture. Middle/senior managers will make mistakes, but not be held accountable (or hold themselves accountable) for them, and new/younger employees are heavily scrutinized. It felt like I was gossiped about constantly by my manager colleagues behind the scenes/my back, which didn't feel great or help me improve. The matrixed project environment and limited budgets make you feel like you are constantly staying afloat with billability, and it's your responsibility to keep billable targets as is the case in consulting. My feedback/recommendations to change things fell on deaf ears. I had both heavy micromanagement and a severe lack of management across projects. In my interviews, they said they had hoped to resolve their long-standing issues with retention. Unfortunately, they are ignoring the root cause of that issue and, allegedly, have been for years.

Viewing 85 - 87 of 2,740 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,012 ICF reviews submitted anonymously by ICF employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ICF is right for you.