employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Interface People

Is this your company?

Interface People Software Developer reviews

2.3

17% would recommend to a friend

(4 total reviews)

Jenny Blue

Not enough data to show CEO approval

17% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

4 reviews
2.0
Jun 3, 2025

Downsides of a "small company"

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some of the people working there are genuinely nice and positive, team-oriented and supportive of the company’s mission. Even in upper management, there were individuals who seemed like genuinely good people. I never received much pushback when requesting time off, which I appreciated. They’re generally open to investing in tools or software you believe will help with your work, and there’s not much red tape around it. When the company is doing well, they like to portray themselves as generous—offering things like Christmas parties and other small perks. The benefits were decent. Not amazing, but respectable. They did encourage people to take time off when dealing with physical illness.

Cons

Upper management constantly shifted priorities, meetings, and expectations. They claimed to care about employee concerns but were clearly more focused on revenue and client acquisition, without reinvesting meaningfully in the team or QA processes. Frequent favoritism and nepotism—family members and friends of leadership held key roles, often treated with leniency or given insider info. Promises were often made but rarely kept. People would suddenly be let go without explanation, warning or discussion. So if you do end up working for them and suspect you're not in lock step with management, I'd recommend you get out before they show you the door. They used the “small company” excuse to justify disorganization, overwork, and lack of accountability. Reviews were lopsided, with a focus on criticism and peer critiques that leadership could read, creating an uncomfortable atmosphere. KPIs seemed more like tools to justify firing or salary stagnation rather than improve performance. Middle managers were often untrained and without leadership skills. Suggestions to improve workflow or morale were routinely dismissed. I don't think they meant ill in all circumstances, but the overall philosophy I found to be unintentionally toxic. I became more depressed and stressed working here than any other place in my career. I've never had 1 on 1's and performance reviews be so focused on all the ways my KPIs weren't 100% anywhere else. It instilled bad habits in me, making me constantly second guess myself, but then worry about the extra amount of time it was taking to go over it all again.

1.0
Aug 3, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The environment and people are great, everyone is willing to go out of their way to help you. There are very intelligent people scattered throughout the company. Dress is casual. There are company meetings for developers where you can provide input and learn the best practices for developers. Flexibility.

Cons

There is absolutely no QA and as a result broken software gets pushed to the customers. If you're a developer be prepared to be doing support the majority of the time. The support team has no clue what they are doing and have become, simply, a ticket creation system. Management directives directly conflict with the agile scrum process that leadership is trying to fit their processes within. Managers rarely communicate with you unless there is negative feedback. Leadership has a lack of vision, so much so that they push for bugs to be put back into newer versions for "lack of backwards compatibility". Software is archaic at best. One of the teams is heavily reliant on a tool built internally that doesn't work, and that same broken "internal tool" is sold to customers. The way that software is developed causes support tickets to be generated continuously. Sales sets the due dates for contracts with no vision of company resources causing due dates for multiple projects to fall on the same day/week. PM's don't know what they are doing and as a result the developers have to add another hat to their list. Sourcing is very weak for a few teams. What is documentation? Because the frameworks used here are so old, there is very little room for career advancement. Huge learning curve and no training. Leadership has no desire to listen to the concerns of the developers. Company preys on new developers because "they need the experience and won't leave" Turnover rate is very high. Leadership claims that teams are "self managing" but will step in for the smallest things if they do not like it. Sticking to the Scrum processes is leadership's number one priority even if it is causing problems for a team's workflow. As a developer you will be wearing all of the hats and juggling multiple projects at any given time. Oncall shifts force you to stay awake all night during the work week and you are still expected to make it into the office on time.

4.0
Aug 17, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Great people and great culture - Company goes out of its way to treat employees - Flexibility in schedule when life events come up - Paid paternity leave, amount of PTO is above industry standard - Benefits are ridiculously good - Casual dress - Autonomy as a developer(with product owner approval) I overall really enjoyed my time at IPeople. The company has a great vibe to it and everyone is friendly. I got the vibe that most people were there because they really enjoyed the company. One of the things I liked is that developers have a lot of autonomy in shaping the product, if you have and idea, you can take it to the product owner and if they agree, you can code it into the product. The company regularly stocks the kitchen with snacks, sodas, fresh fruit, etc. They also have pizza on most Wednesdays. This was a huge perk and a sign that the company wanted to go above and beyond to keep employees happy. The company is very flexible and understanding when family events come up, they will work with you and give you time off as needed for doctors appointments, etc. They are pretty much the only company that offers paid paternity leave in addition to your already given PTO, this is a big deal. My son was born during my time a IPeople and the company was really accommodating about me taking time off and happily welcomed me back. The amount of time off with this company is great. You get your standard couple weeks off, then on top of that the company pays employees to take time off during Thanksgiving and Christmas. They did change this for 2016 to make it so you chose either holiday instead of both but this was actually one of the major things that made me accept my offer. Dress is casual, you'll see most people wearing jeans, shorts, flip flops, etc.... pretty much anything goes. Advice to those considering Interface People: If you're on the fence and here because your are considering interviewing or joining IPeople, do it. Its a great company, it does have flaws but I've overall liked working here.

Cons

- Leadership sometimes feels disorganized - At times it feels like we ship software without proper QA - The normal downsides of working for a small company(wearing many hats, etc.) One of the things I struggled with was the fact that there wasn't a barrier between leaderships decision making and the development teams. Some people like this but it took away from development time. Leadership would include developers into decision making meetings where it felt like they already had their mind made up. The better solution would be that leadership makes these decisions and then relays that through the product owner, scrum masters, etc. Developers should only be included in meetings where they are a technical resource, not business decision meetings. Some people may actually like that they are part of the day to day business but I just wanted to code. I wish we had a legit QA person. Some teams had a QA person but they also had other duties. Our team unfortunately did not have a QA person, the expectation is that developers QA their own stuff before committing and unit tests were being written.... which is true, we did that but a dedicated QA would catch so many things that we just don't think to try.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 4 Reviews

Glassdoor has 22 Interface People reviews submitted anonymously by Interface People employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Interface People is right for you.