Korn Ferry reviews

3.3

55% would recommend to a friend

(3,899 total reviews)
avatar

Gary D. Burnison

55% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Korn Ferry has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 3,899 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Korn Ferry employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
2.0
May 29, 2024

Tone Deaf and Heartless

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent pay and benefits. WFH policy.

Cons

The company has gone through at least four RIFs in the last two years, that I'm aware of. It could be more. They hire people with the intention of using their services for a finite amount of time, then get rid of them once they've gotten what they needed. The lay off process was cold and heartless, with my manager notifying me over Zoom by reading a script. HR was on the call as well, but utterly useless and unwilling to help. Trying to get her to respond to my questions via email and chat was like pulling teeth. To add insult to injury, the company is constantly posting tone-deaf "thought leadership" articles about layoffs where they try to position themselves as a company that would never resort to such measures, which is a gross misrepresentation and highly insulting to the thousands of people they've laid off in recent years. When a company goes through this many rounds of layoffs in such a short period of time, it's not a people problem. It's a business problem. Leadership has no idea what they're doing and none of them are being held accountable for poor revenue performance. Instead, the lower-level workers are paying the price, while the CEO continues to enjoy a massive bonus every year. He needs to go and so does his leadership team.

2.0
Jun 12, 2020

Apply Your Own IP to Yourself

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart, talented people doing good work beneath the c-suite and lots of flexibility.

Cons

• Expensive benefits. Health insurance cost more than $1100 a month, and the 401(k) is a joke -- how can a $2B company offer a discretionary match? I joined KF through an acquisition and the cost of benefits resulted in me taking a 25% hit to my take-home pay. • Disappointing culture, where success is predicated on personal closeness to Gary Burnison or how much you publicly profess your love for Korn Ferry. I've never worked anywhere so self-congratulatory. • Pleads poverty at every turn when it comes to resources, raises, or promotions •Awful onboarding and training—you get a PDF and links to one-size-fits-all videos. They introduced a mentorship program, but mentors were assigned based on tenure at KF, not actual seniority or career levels, so someone at a more senior level could (and often did) get matched with less experienced staff. • Despite public declarations otherwise, people do not matter here. All that matters is shareholders. This is evident from how they balanced the COVID-19 challenges on the backs of staff (mass layoffs and across-the-board double-digit salary cuts). More care was put into communicating the death of a board member than the layoffs and cutbacks.

1.0
Aug 22, 2014

Low Integrity

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Brand recognition Client access Potential There are like most professional services firms many remarkable and take Ted people who work there

Cons

The firm has branded itself as a talent management consultancy (see website) The firm is a search firm that has broadened its product portfolio with a series of acquisitions including PDI, Global Novations, Lominger and FutureStep among others. The vast majority of the Leadership and Talent Consulting practice revenue is driven by product related sales - mostly assessment (PDI) competency related (Lominger) and training (Global Novations) The professionals coming from these acquired companies are highly educated and talented. They are equally limited in their experience with broader talent consulting let alone organization development experience or qualifications. The marketing department is way out ahead of the groups actual capability touting the firm as the new kid in town The leaders in charge of building a broader capability come from these product based companies as well and have not built a practice of this scale so it's really a mess They are very good at recruiting you in emphasizing the opp to build the practice but you should ask about the following: Governance - the CFO controls the practice and demonstrates a lack of experience building a consultancy. Remember that's in addition to being a public company. Partnership - being a partner is a title only. The partners do not work together to build the practice, develop its people or define the practice's future. Access to opportunities - even if you bring relationships you cannot avoid working with the mostly narrowly experienced people from the acquired organizations they have assigned as industry or client leads. These people tend to sell what they are familiar with and be threatened by new people with broader capability. There are few exceptions to this and considering all the search relationships very little green field to build a book of business. The search partner thing is what you would expect - highly variable 're understanding talent and preparing for a meeting with their clients can be a time consuming nightmare. Sales target - Principles and Partners have a sales target of up to 2M/year which at first seems easy until you realize there is absolutely no leverage - few to no consultants to help unless you are selling products where you sell, others deliver and yet another group manages the project. They have lifted and installed the model from PDI. So you need to sell 2M per year, if so make a maybe 100k bonus on top of your 240k base and remember you deliver most of the work. If you are a product pusher and that turns your crank you are in much better shape. The system forces you to sell product - assessments, competency models, training rograms - you get the drill (2014 bonuses paid in June 2014 far below 100k target. I sold 1.8, delivered 90 percent of the work and got 30k and a promotion - huh?) Integrity is the most significant issue - the firm literally does not use its own tools. There is no formal onboarding, almost all training is overview of product and how to sell it, hierarchal performance management, no assessment of leaders ( hardest one to stomach as they are literally impacting the careers of 1000s of professionals as they report assessment results to executives, CEOs and Board. Really concerning) If you are considering this firm because of its potential that makes sense. If you think you can join as a new person and affect change against these practices brought by the acquired organizations and entrenched by the appointment of them at every point of market access and leadership - your mom is right, you really are amazing.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 3,899 Reviews

Glassdoor has 4,809 Korn Ferry reviews submitted anonymously by Korn Ferry employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Korn Ferry is right for you.