Lockheed Martin Director of Engineering reviews

4.0

100% would recommend to a friend

(2 total reviews)
avatar

James D. Taiclet

Not enough data to show CEO approval

99% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

2 reviews
4.0
Sep 20, 2022

Good Company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Protecting countries around the world

Cons

Somewhat stoic culture focused on a certain mold of leader

4.0
Aug 18, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lockheed is a good company; it used to be a great company to work for, but times have changed. I found the work to be interesting, management enlightened, and it was a company that cared for its employees as well as its shareholders. When I started there as a young engineer in 1967, as long as you worked your butt off , were smart, learned fast and used good judgment, you had a career for life. I think it is different now

Cons

I worked for Lockheed for 32 years, retiring as a Director at age 55 after serving as a Director of Engineering and then Director of Programs for space programs in Sunnyvale for over 15 years. The salaries they (and other Aerospace companies as well) are giving to both young engineers and experienced engineers are very low, compared to other non-engineering professions. When I left Lockheed 20 years ago, a senior staff engineer made $110K, from the data presented here, it looks like the salary is around $120K!! 9% salary increase in 20 years or 0.5%/year? I own a national manufacturing company and pay my supervisors with little or no college who are in their early 30's more than young aerospace system engineers. This is not right. It is not only a Lockheed Martin issue; it this way throughout the aerospace industry (and other industries who employ engineers).

Glassdoor has 16,720 Lockheed Martin reviews submitted anonymously by Lockheed Martin employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lockheed Martin is right for you.